Hispana. Acceso en línea al Patrimonio Cultural Digital Español

Está en:  › Datos do registro

A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography

Identificadores del recurso

1877-7058

https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521

Procedencia

(Repositorio Institucional de Asturias: RIA)

Ficha

Título:: A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography
Tema:: Conoscopic Holography; Inspection; Publicado
Descrición:: Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.; This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and FEDER (DPI2012-30987), the Regional Ministry of Economy and Employment of the Principality of Asturias (Spain) (SV-PA-13-ECOEMP- 15) and the Government of the Principality of Asturias through the Programme “Severo Ochoa” 2014 of PhD grants for research and teaching (BP14-049).; Análisis de diferencias de resultados en términos metrológicos de distancia 3D entre planos, utilizando diferentes estategias de digitalizado con un sensor de Holografía Conoscópica integrado en una máquina de medición por coordenadas.
Fonte:: 840;847
Idioma:: English
Relación:: Procedia Engineering; 132; No, esta versión no ha sido citada
Autor/Productor:: Zapico, Pablo; Fernández, Pedro; Blanco, David; Valiño, Gonzalo; Rico, Jose Carlos
Dereitos:: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es
Data:: 2016-06-09T09:32:50Z; 2015-12
Tipo de recurso:: article
Formato:: application/pdf

oai_dc

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
1. <dc:title>A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</dc:title>
2. <dc:creator>Zapico, Pablo</dc:creator>
3. <dc:creator>Fernández, Pedro</dc:creator>
4. <dc:creator>Blanco, David</dc:creator>
5. <dc:creator>Valiño, Gonzalo</dc:creator>
6. <dc:creator>Rico, Jose Carlos</dc:creator>
7. <dc:subject>Conoscopic Holography</dc:subject>
8. <dc:subject>Inspection</dc:subject>
9. <dc:subject>Publicado</dc:subject>
10. <dc:description>Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.</dc:description>
11. <dc:description>This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and FEDER (DPI2012-30987), the Regional Ministry of Economy and Employment of the Principality of Asturias (Spain) (SV-PA-13-ECOEMP- 15) and the Government of the Principality of Asturias through the Programme “Severo Ochoa” 2014 of PhD grants for research and teaching (BP14-049).</dc:description>
12. <dc:description>Análisis de diferencias de resultados en términos metrológicos de distancia 3D entre planos, utilizando diferentes estategias de digitalizado con un sensor de Holografía Conoscópica integrado en una máquina de medición por coordenadas.</dc:description>
13. <dc:date>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dc:date>
14. <dc:date>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dc:date>
15. <dc:date>2015-12</dc:date>
16. <dc:type>article</dc:type>
17. <dc:identifier>1877-7058</dc:identifier>
18. <dc:identifier>https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521</dc:identifier>
19. <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
20. <dc:relation>Procedia Engineering</dc:relation>
21. <dc:relation>132</dc:relation>
22. <dc:relation>No, esta versión no ha sido citada</dc:relation>
23. <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es</dc:rights>
24. <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
25. <dc:source>840;847</dc:source>
</oai_dc:dc>

didl

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<d:DIDL schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
1. <d:DIDLInfo>
  1. <dcterms:created schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dcterms:created>
  </d:DIDLInfo>
2. <d:Item id="hdl_123456789_6521">
  1. <d:Descriptor>
    1. <d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
      1. <dii:Identifier schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:123456789/6521</dii:Identifier>
      </d:Statement>
    </d:Descriptor>
  2. <d:Descriptor>
    1. <d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
      1. <oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
        <dc:title>A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</dc:title>
        <dc:creator>Zapico, Pablo</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Fernández, Pedro</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Blanco, David</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Valiño, Gonzalo</dc:creator>
        <dc:creator>Rico, Jose Carlos</dc:creator>
        <dc:subject>Conoscopic Holography</dc:subject>
        <dc:subject>Inspection</dc:subject>
        <dc:description>Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.</dc:description>
        <dc:date>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dc:date>
        <dc:date>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dc:date>
        <dc:date>2015-12</dc:date>
        <dc:type>article</dc:type>
        <dc:identifier>1877-7058</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier>https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521</dc:identifier>
        <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        <dc:relation>Procedia Engineering</dc:relation>
        <dc:relation>132</dc:relation>
        <dc:relation>No, esta versión no ha sido citada</dc:relation>
        <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es</dc:rights>
        <dc:source>840;847</dc:source>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </d:Statement>
    </d:Descriptor>
  3. <d:Component id="123456789_6521_1">
    1. <d:Resource mimeType="application/pdf" ref="http://172.28.36.237:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6521/1/Archivo.pdf" />
    </d:Component>
  </d:Item>
</d:DIDL>

dim

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<dim:dim schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
1. <dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="author">Zapico, Pablo</dim:field>
2. <dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="author">Fernández, Pedro</dim:field>
3. <dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="author">Blanco, David</dim:field>
4. <dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="author">Valiño, Gonzalo</dim:field>
5. <dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="author">Rico, Jose Carlos</dim:field>
6. <dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="accessioned">2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dim:field>
7. <dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="available">2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dim:field>
8. <dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="issued">2015-12</dim:field>
9. <dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="issn">1877-7058</dim:field>
10. <dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="uri">https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521</dim:field>
11. <dim:field element="description" lang="eng" mdschema="dc" qualifier="abstract">Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.</dim:field>
12. <dim:field element="description" lang="eng" mdschema="dc" qualifier="sponsorship">This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and FEDER (DPI2012-30987), the Regional Ministry of Economy and Employment of the Principality of Asturias (Spain) (SV-PA-13-ECOEMP- 15) and the Government of the Principality of Asturias through the Programme “Severo Ochoa” 2014 of PhD grants for research and teaching (BP14-049).</dim:field>
13. <dim:field element="description" lang="eng" mdschema="dc" qualifier="tableofcontents">Análisis de diferencias de resultados en términos metrológicos de distancia 3D entre planos, utilizando diferentes estategias de digitalizado con un sensor de Holografía Conoscópica integrado en una máquina de medición por coordenadas.</dim:field>
14. <dim:field element="language" lang="eng" mdschema="dc" qualifier="iso">eng</dim:field>
15. <dim:field element="relation" lang="eng" mdschema="dc" qualifier="ispartof">Procedia Engineering</dim:field>
16. <dim:field element="relation" lang="eng" mdschema="dc" qualifier="haspart">132</dim:field>
17. <dim:field element="relation" lang="eng" mdschema="dc" qualifier="isreferencedby">No, esta versión no ha sido citada</dim:field>
18. <dim:field element="rights" lang="eng" mdschema="dc">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es</dim:field>
19. <dim:field element="source" mdschema="dc">840;847</dim:field>
20. <dim:field element="subject" lang="eng" mdschema="dc">Conoscopic Holography</dim:field>
21. <dim:field element="subject" lang="eng" mdschema="dc">Inspection</dim:field>
22. <dim:field element="subject" lang="eng" mdschema="dc" qualifier="classification">Publicado</dim:field>
23. <dim:field element="title" lang="eng" mdschema="dc">A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</dim:field>
24. <dim:field element="type" lang="eng" mdschema="dc">article</dim:field>
</dim:dim>

etdms

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<thesis schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
1. <title>A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</title>
2. <creator>Zapico, Pablo</creator>
3. <creator>Fernández, Pedro</creator>
4. <creator>Blanco, David</creator>
5. <creator>Valiño, Gonzalo</creator>
6. <creator>Rico, Jose Carlos</creator>
7. <subject>Conoscopic Holography</subject>
8. <subject>Inspection</subject>
9. <description>Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.</description>
10. <date>2016-06-09</date>
11. <date>2016-06-09</date>
12. <date>2015-12</date>
13. <type>article</type>
14. <identifier>1877-7058</identifier>
15. <identifier>https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521</identifier>
16. <language>eng</language>
17. <relation>Procedia Engineering</relation>
18. <relation>132</relation>
19. <relation>No, esta versión no ha sido citada</relation>
20. <rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es</rights>
21. <source>840;847</source>
</thesis>

marc

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<record schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
1. <leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
2. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="042">
  1. <subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
  </datafield>
3. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
  1. <subfield code="a">Zapico, Pablo</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
4. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
  1. <subfield code="a">Fernández, Pedro</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
5. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
  1. <subfield code="a">Blanco, David</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
6. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
  1. <subfield code="a">Valiño, Gonzalo</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
7. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
  1. <subfield code="a">Rico, Jose Carlos</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
8. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="260">
  1. <subfield code="c">2015-12</subfield>
  </datafield>
9. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="520">
  1. <subfield code="a">Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.</subfield>
  </datafield>
10. <datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
  1. <subfield code="a">1877-7058</subfield>
  </datafield>
11. <datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
  1. <subfield code="a">https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521</subfield>
  </datafield>
12. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">Conoscopic Holography</subfield>
  </datafield>
13. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">Inspection</subfield>
  </datafield>
14. <datafield ind1="0" ind2="0" tag="245">
  1. <subfield code="a">A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>

mets

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<mets ID=" DSpace_ITEM_123456789-6521" OBJID=" hdl:123456789/6521" PROFILE="DSpace METS SIP Profile 1.0" TYPE="DSpace ITEM" schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd">
1. <metsHdr CREATEDATE="2023-01-14T18:19:38Z">
  1. <agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION">
    1. <name>RIA</name>
    </agent>
  </metsHdr>
2. <dmdSec ID="DMD_123456789_6521">
  1. <mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS">
    1. <xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
      1. <mods:mods schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
        <mods:name>
        <mods:role>
        <mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
        </mods:role>
        <mods:namePart>Zapico, Pablo</mods:namePart>
        </mods:name>
        <mods:name>
        <mods:role>
        <mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
        </mods:role>
        <mods:namePart>Fernández, Pedro</mods:namePart>
        </mods:name>
        <mods:name>
        <mods:role>
        <mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
        </mods:role>
        <mods:namePart>Blanco, David</mods:namePart>
        </mods:name>
        <mods:name>
        <mods:role>
        <mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
        </mods:role>
        <mods:namePart>Valiño, Gonzalo</mods:namePart>
        </mods:name>
        <mods:name>
        <mods:role>
        <mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
        </mods:role>
        <mods:namePart>Rico, Jose Carlos</mods:namePart>
        </mods:name>
        <mods:extension>
        <mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
        </mods:extension>
        <mods:extension>
        <mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</mods:dateAvailable>
        </mods:extension>
        <mods:originInfo>
        <mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2015-12</mods:dateIssued>
        </mods:originInfo>
        <mods:identifier type="issn">1877-7058</mods:identifier>
        <mods:identifier type="uri">https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521</mods:identifier>
        <mods:abstract>Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.</mods:abstract>
        <mods:language>
        <mods:languageTerm authority="rfc3066">eng</mods:languageTerm>
        </mods:language>
        <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es</mods:accessCondition>
        <mods:subject>
        <mods:topic>Conoscopic Holography</mods:topic>
        </mods:subject>
        <mods:subject>
        <mods:topic>Inspection</mods:topic>
        </mods:subject>
        <mods:titleInfo>
        <mods:title>A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</mods:title>
        </mods:titleInfo>
        <mods:genre>article</mods:genre>
        </mods:mods>
      </xmlData>
    </mdWrap>
  </dmdSec>
3. <amdSec ID="FO_123456789_6521_1">
  1. <techMD ID="TECH_O_123456789_6521_1">
    1. <mdWrap MDTYPE="PREMIS">
      1. <xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/PREMIS-v1-0.xsd">
        <premis:premis>
        <premis:object>
        <premis:objectIdentifier>
        <premis:objectIdentifierType>URL</premis:objectIdentifierType>
        <premis:objectIdentifierValue>http://172.28.36.237:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6521/1/Archivo.pdf</premis:objectIdentifierValue>
        </premis:objectIdentifier>
        <premis:objectCategory>File</premis:objectCategory>
        <premis:objectCharacteristics>
        <premis:fixity>
        <premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>MD5</premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>
        <premis:messageDigest>11b8c8efb0f8da5a7fa8386487a029c2</premis:messageDigest>
        </premis:fixity>
        <premis:size>168833</premis:size>
        <premis:format>
        <premis:formatDesignation>
        <premis:formatName>application/pdf</premis:formatName>
        </premis:formatDesignation>
        </premis:format>
        </premis:objectCharacteristics>
        <premis:originalName>Archivo.pdf</premis:originalName>
        </premis:object>
        </premis:premis>
        </xmlData>
      </mdWrap>
    </techMD>
  </amdSec>
4. <fileSec>
  1. <fileGrp USE="ORIGINAL">
    1. <file ADMID="FO_123456789_6521_1" CHECKSUM="11b8c8efb0f8da5a7fa8386487a029c2" CHECKSUMTYPE="MD5" GROUPID="GROUP_BITSTREAM_123456789_6521_1" ID="BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_123456789_6521_1" MIMETYPE="application/pdf" SEQ="1" SIZE="168833">
      1. <FLocat LOCTYPE="URL" href="http://172.28.36.237:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6521/1/Archivo.pdf" type="simple" />
      </file>
    </fileGrp>
  </fileSec>
5. <structMap LABEL="DSpace Object" TYPE="LOGICAL">
  1. <div ADMID="DMD_123456789_6521" TYPE="DSpace Object Contents">
    1. <div TYPE="DSpace BITSTREAM">
      1. <fptr FILEID="BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_123456789_6521_1" />
      </div>
    </div>
  </structMap>
</mets>

mods

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<mods:mods schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
1. <mods:name>
  1. <mods:namePart>Zapico, Pablo</mods:namePart>
  </mods:name>
2. <mods:name>
  1. <mods:namePart>Fernández, Pedro</mods:namePart>
  </mods:name>
3. <mods:name>
  1. <mods:namePart>Blanco, David</mods:namePart>
  </mods:name>
4. <mods:name>
  1. <mods:namePart>Valiño, Gonzalo</mods:namePart>
  </mods:name>
5. <mods:name>
  1. <mods:namePart>Rico, Jose Carlos</mods:namePart>
  </mods:name>
6. <mods:extension>
  1. <mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</mods:dateAvailable>
  </mods:extension>
7. <mods:extension>
  1. <mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
  </mods:extension>
8. <mods:originInfo>
  1. <mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2015-12</mods:dateIssued>
  </mods:originInfo>
9. <mods:identifier type="issn">1877-7058</mods:identifier>
10. <mods:identifier type="uri">https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521</mods:identifier>
11. <mods:abstract>Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.</mods:abstract>
12. <mods:language>
  1. <mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
  </mods:language>
13. <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es</mods:accessCondition>
14. <mods:subject>
  1. <mods:topic>Conoscopic Holography</mods:topic>
  </mods:subject>
15. <mods:subject>
  1. <mods:topic>Inspection</mods:topic>
  </mods:subject>
16. <mods:titleInfo>
  1. <mods:title>A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</mods:title>
  </mods:titleInfo>
17. <mods:genre>article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>

ore

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<atom:entry schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom http://www.kbcafe.com/rss/atom.xsd.xml">
1. <atom:id>https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521/ore.xml</atom:id>
2. <atom:link href="https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521" rel="alternate" />
3. <atom:link href="https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521/ore.xml" rel="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/describes" />
4. <atom:link href="https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521/ore.xml#atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" />
5. <atom:published>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</atom:published>
6. <atom:updated>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</atom:updated>
7. <atom:source>
  1. <atom:generator>RIA</atom:generator>
  </atom:source>
8. <atom:title>A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</atom:title>
9. <atom:author>
  1. <atom:name>Zapico, Pablo</atom:name>
  </atom:author>
10. <atom:author>
  1. <atom:name>Fernández, Pedro</atom:name>
  </atom:author>
11. <atom:author>
  1. <atom:name>Blanco, David</atom:name>
  </atom:author>
12. <atom:author>
  1. <atom:name>Valiño, Gonzalo</atom:name>
  </atom:author>
13. <atom:author>
  1. <atom:name>Rico, Jose Carlos</atom:name>
  </atom:author>
14. <atom:category label="Aggregation" scheme="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" term="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/Aggregation" />
15. <atom:category scheme="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/atom/modified" term="2016-06-09T09:32:50Z" />
16. <atom:category label="DSpace Item" scheme="http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/" term="DSpaceItem" />
17. <atom:link href="http://172.28.36.237:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6521/1/Archivo.pdf" length="168833" rel="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/aggregates" title="Archivo.pdf" type="application/pdf" />
18. <oreatom:triples>
  1. <rdf:Description about="https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521/ore.xml#atom">
    1. <rdf:type resource="http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceItem" />
    2. <dcterms:modified>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dcterms:modified>
    </rdf:Description>
  2. <rdf:Description about="http://172.28.36.237:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6521/1/Archivo.pdf">
    1. <rdf:type resource="http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceBitstream" />
    2. <dcterms:description>ORIGINAL</dcterms:description>
    </rdf:Description>
  </oreatom:triples>
</atom:entry>

qdc

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<qdc:qualifieddc schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
1. <dc:title>A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</dc:title>
2. <dc:creator>Zapico, Pablo</dc:creator>
3. <dc:creator>Fernández, Pedro</dc:creator>
4. <dc:creator>Blanco, David</dc:creator>
5. <dc:creator>Valiño, Gonzalo</dc:creator>
6. <dc:creator>Rico, Jose Carlos</dc:creator>
7. <dc:subject>Conoscopic Holography</dc:subject>
8. <dc:subject>Inspection</dc:subject>
9. <dcterms:abstract>Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.</dcterms:abstract>
10. <dcterms:dateAccepted>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
11. <dcterms:available>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dcterms:available>
12. <dcterms:created>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dcterms:created>
13. <dcterms:issued>2015-12</dcterms:issued>
14. <dc:type>article</dc:type>
15. <dc:identifier>1877-7058</dc:identifier>
16. <dc:identifier>https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521</dc:identifier>
17. <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
18. <dc:relation>Procedia Engineering</dc:relation>
19. <dc:relation>132</dc:relation>
20. <dc:relation>No, esta versión no ha sido citada</dc:relation>
21. <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es</dc:rights>
22. <dc:source>840;847</dc:source>
</qdc:qualifieddc>

rdf

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<rdf:RDF schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
1. <ow:Publication about="oai:http://172.28.36.237/:123456789/6521">
  1. <dc:title>A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</dc:title>
  2. <dc:creator>Zapico, Pablo</dc:creator>
  3. <dc:creator>Fernández, Pedro</dc:creator>
  4. <dc:creator>Blanco, David</dc:creator>
  5. <dc:creator>Valiño, Gonzalo</dc:creator>
  6. <dc:creator>Rico, Jose Carlos</dc:creator>
  7. <dc:subject>Conoscopic Holography</dc:subject>
  8. <dc:subject>Inspection</dc:subject>
  9. <dc:description>Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.</dc:description>
  10. <dc:date>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dc:date>
  11. <dc:date>2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</dc:date>
  12. <dc:date>2015-12</dc:date>
  13. <dc:type>article</dc:type>
  14. <dc:identifier>1877-7058</dc:identifier>
  15. <dc:identifier>https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521</dc:identifier>
  16. <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  17. <dc:relation>Procedia Engineering</dc:relation>
  18. <dc:relation>132</dc:relation>
  19. <dc:relation>No, esta versión no ha sido citada</dc:relation>
  20. <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es</dc:rights>
  21. <dc:source>840;847</dc:source>
  </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>

xoai

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<metadata schemaLocation="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai http://www.lyncode.com/xsd/xoai.xsd">
1. <element name="dc">
  1. <element name="contributor">
    1. <element name="author">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">Zapico, Pablo</field>
        <field name="value">Fernández, Pedro</field>
        <field name="value">Blanco, David</field>
        <field name="value">Valiño, Gonzalo</field>
        <field name="value">Rico, Jose Carlos</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  2. <element name="date">
    1. <element name="accessioned">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    2. <element name="available">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">2016-06-09T09:32:50Z</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    3. <element name="issued">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">2015-12</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  3. <element name="identifier">
    1. <element name="issn">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">1877-7058</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    2. <element name="uri">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">https://ria.asturias.es/RIA/handle/123456789/6521</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  4. <element name="description">
    1. <element name="abstract">
      1. <element name="eng">
        <field name="value">Low density digitizing is a suitable approach for verification distances between pairs of machined flat surfaces. When defining a digitizing procedure of this type of features, two approaches could be applied: discrete or continuous scanning. Discrete Scanning (D) is performed with a static sensor, but the information for each single measurement comes from a constrained area. On the other hand, since Continuous Scanning (C) is carried out with a moving sensor, the information for each single measurement comes from a swept area. In this work, a comparison between these two approaches, when digitizing with a Conoscopic Holography sensor, is performed. The main objective is to establish their influence upon surface reconstruction quality and, thereafter, upon measurement reliability.</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    2. <element name="sponsorship">
      1. <element name="eng">
        <field name="value">This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and FEDER (DPI2012-30987), the Regional Ministry of Economy and Employment of the Principality of Asturias (Spain) (SV-PA-13-ECOEMP- 15) and the Government of the Principality of Asturias through the Programme “Severo Ochoa” 2014 of PhD grants for research and teaching (BP14-049).</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    3. <element name="tableofcontents">
      1. <element name="eng">
        <field name="value">Análisis de diferencias de resultados en términos metrológicos de distancia 3D entre planos, utilizando diferentes estategias de digitalizado con un sensor de Holografía Conoscópica integrado en una máquina de medición por coordenadas.</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  5. <element name="language">
    1. <element name="iso">
      1. <element name="eng">
        <field name="value">eng</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  6. <element name="relation">
    1. <element name="ispartof">
      1. <element name="eng">
        <field name="value">Procedia Engineering</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    2. <element name="haspart">
      1. <element name="eng">
        <field name="value">132</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    3. <element name="isreferencedby">
      1. <element name="eng">
        <field name="value">No, esta versión no ha sido citada</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  7. <element name="rights">
    1. <element name="eng">
      1. <field name="value">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es</field>
      </element>
    </element>
  8. <element name="source">
    1. <element name="none">
      1. <field name="value">840;847</field>
      </element>
    </element>
  9. <element name="subject">
    1. <element name="eng">
      1. <field name="value">Conoscopic Holography</field>
      2. <field name="value">Inspection</field>
      </element>
    2. <element name="classification">
      1. <element name="eng">
        <field name="value">Publicado</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  10. <element name="title">
    1. <element name="eng">
      1. <field name="value">A comparison between discrete and continuous scanning with conoscopic holography</field>
      </element>
    </element>
  11. <element name="type">
    1. <element name="eng">
      1. <field name="value">article</field>
      </element>
    </element>
  </element>
2. <element name="bundles">
  1. <element name="bundle">
    1. <field name="name">ORIGINAL</field>
    2. <element name="bitstreams">
      1. <element name="bitstream">
        <field name="name">Archivo.pdf</field>
        <field name="originalName">Archivo.pdf</field>
        <field name="format">application/pdf</field>
        <field name="size">168833</field>
        <field name="url">http://172.28.36.237:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6521/1/Archivo.pdf</field>
        <field name="checksum">11b8c8efb0f8da5a7fa8386487a029c2</field>
        <field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
        <field name="sid">1</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  </element>
3. <element name="others">
  1. <field name="handle">123456789/6521</field>
  2. <field name="identifier">oai:http://172.28.36.237/:123456789/6521</field>
  3. <field name="lastModifyDate">2018-04-18 12:42:15.32</field>
  </element>
4. <element name="repository">
  1. <field name="name">RIA</field>
  2. <field name="mail">gemma.gonzalez@ricoh.es</field>
  </element>
</metadata>