Hispana. Acceso en línea al Patrimonio Cultural Digital Español

Está en:  › Datos do registro

Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies

Identificadores del recurso

978-84-695-6254-3

http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365

Procedencia

(Tesis de la Universitat Jaume I)

Ficha

Título:: Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies
Tema:: evaluation; applied linguistics; rhetorical strategies; praise; criticism; discourse; Anàlisi del discurs (Llingüística Aplicada); 81
Descrición:: The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.
Fonte:: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)
Idioma:: English
Autor/Productor:: Moreno Pichastor, Soledad
Editor:: Universitat Jaume I
Otros colaboradores/productores:: Alcón Soler, Eva; Universitat Jaume I. Departament de Filologia Anglesa i Romànica
Dereitos:: ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs.; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Data:: 2012-10-23T12:03:47Z; 2009-09-29
Tipo de recurso:: info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis; info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Formato:: 408 p.; application/pdf

oai_dc

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
1. <dc:title>Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</dc:title>
2. <dc:creator>Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</dc:creator>
3. <dc:contributor>Alcón Soler, Eva</dc:contributor>
4. <dc:contributor>Universitat Jaume I. Departament de Filologia Anglesa i Romànica</dc:contributor>
5. <dc:subject>evaluation</dc:subject>
6. <dc:subject>applied linguistics</dc:subject>
7. <dc:subject>rhetorical strategies</dc:subject>
8. <dc:subject>praise</dc:subject>
9. <dc:subject>criticism</dc:subject>
10. <dc:subject>discourse</dc:subject>
11. <dc:subject>Anàlisi del discurs (Llingüística Aplicada)</dc:subject>
12. <dc:subject>81</dc:subject>
13. <dc:description>The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</dc:description>
14. <dc:date>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dc:date>
15. <dc:date>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dc:date>
16. <dc:date>2009-09-29</dc:date>
17. <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
18. <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
19. <dc:identifier>978-84-695-6254-3</dc:identifier>
20. <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</dc:identifier>
21. <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
22. <dc:rights>ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs.</dc:rights>
23. <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
24. <dc:format>408 p.</dc:format>
25. <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
26. <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
27. <dc:publisher>Universitat Jaume I</dc:publisher>
28. <dc:source>TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)</dc:source>
</oai_dc:dc>

dim

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<dim:dim schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
1. <dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc">Universitat Jaume I. Departament de Filologia Anglesa i Romànica</dim:field>
2. <dim:field authority="19965b3c-3b8d-4c7d-bd53-cb27608e4d11" confidence="-1" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="author">Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</dim:field>
3. <dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="authoremail">solemoreno2000@yahoo.es</dim:field>
4. <dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="authoremailshow">true</dim:field>
5. <dim:field authority="064b4c9a-fece-4e00-9d7a-86f3ed29b35f" confidence="-1" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="director">Alcón Soler, Eva</dim:field>
6. <dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="authorsendemail">true</dim:field>
7. <dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="accessioned">2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dim:field>
8. <dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="available">2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dim:field>
9. <dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="issued">2009-09-29</dim:field>
10. <dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="isbn">978-84-695-6254-3</dim:field>
11. <dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</dim:field>
12. <dim:field element="description" lang="eng" mdschema="dc" qualifier="abstract">The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</dim:field>
13. <dim:field element="format" mdschema="dc" qualifier="extent">408 p.</dim:field>
14. <dim:field element="format" mdschema="dc" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
15. <dim:field element="language" mdschema="dc" qualifier="iso">eng</dim:field>
16. <dim:field element="publisher" mdschema="dc">Universitat Jaume I</dim:field>
17. <dim:field element="rights" mdschema="dc" qualifier="license">ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs.</dim:field>
18. <dim:field element="rights" mdschema="dc" qualifier="accessLevel">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dim:field>
19. <dim:field element="source" mdschema="dc">TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)</dim:field>
20. <dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc">evaluation</dim:field>
21. <dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc">applied linguistics</dim:field>
22. <dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc">rhetorical strategies</dim:field>
23. <dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc">praise</dim:field>
24. <dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc">criticism</dim:field>
25. <dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc">discourse</dim:field>
26. <dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="other">Anàlisi del discurs (Llingüística Aplicada)</dim:field>
27. <dim:field element="subject" lang="cat" mdschema="dc" qualifier="udc">81</dim:field>
28. <dim:field element="title" mdschema="dc">Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</dim:field>
29. <dim:field element="type" mdschema="dc">info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dim:field>
30. <dim:field element="type" mdschema="dc">info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dim:field>
31. <dim:field element="embargo" mdschema="dc" qualifier="terms">cap</dim:field>
</dim:dim>

etdms

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<thesis schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
1. <title>Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</title>
2. <creator>Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</creator>
3. <contributor>solemoreno2000@yahoo.es</contributor>
4. <contributor>true</contributor>
5. <contributor>Alcón Soler, Eva</contributor>
6. <contributor>true</contributor>
7. <subject>evaluation</subject>
8. <subject>applied linguistics</subject>
9. <subject>rhetorical strategies</subject>
10. <subject>praise</subject>
11. <subject>criticism</subject>
12. <subject>discourse</subject>
13. <description>The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</description>
14. <date>2012-10-23</date>
15. <date>2012-10-23</date>
16. <date>2009-09-29</date>
17. <type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</type>
18. <type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type>
19. <identifier>978-84-695-6254-3</identifier>
20. <identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</identifier>
21. <language>eng</language>
22. <rights>ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs.</rights>
23. <rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights>
24. <publisher>Universitat Jaume I</publisher>
25. <source>TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)</source>
</thesis>

marc

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<record schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
1. <leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
2. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="042">
  1. <subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
  </datafield>
3. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
  1. <subfield code="a">Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="e">author</subfield>
  </datafield>
4. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="260">
  1. <subfield code="c">2009-09-29</subfield>
  </datafield>
5. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="520">
  1. <subfield code="a">The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</subfield>
  </datafield>
6. <datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
  1. <subfield code="a">978-84-695-6254-3</subfield>
  </datafield>
7. <datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
  1. <subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</subfield>
  </datafield>
8. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">evaluation</subfield>
  </datafield>
9. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">applied linguistics</subfield>
  </datafield>
10. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">rhetorical strategies</subfield>
  </datafield>
11. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">praise</subfield>
  </datafield>
12. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">criticism</subfield>
  </datafield>
13. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">discourse</subfield>
  </datafield>
14. <datafield ind1="0" ind2="0" tag="245">
  1. <subfield code="a">Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>

marc_ccuc

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<record schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
1. <leader>nam a 5i 4500</leader>
2. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">evaluation</subfield>
  </datafield>
3. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">applied linguistics</subfield>
  </datafield>
4. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">rhetorical strategies</subfield>
  </datafield>
5. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">praise</subfield>
  </datafield>
6. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">criticism</subfield>
  </datafield>
7. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
  1. <subfield code="a">discourse</subfield>
  </datafield>
8. <datafield ind1="1" ind2="0" tag="245">
  1. <subfield code="a">Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</subfield>
  </datafield>
9. <datafield ind1=" " ind2="1" tag="264">
  1. <subfield code="a">[Castelló] :</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="b">Universitat Jaume I,</subfield>
  3. <subfield code="c">2012</subfield>
  </datafield>
10. <datafield ind1="4" ind2="0" tag="856">
  1. <subfield code="z">Accés lliure</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="u">http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</subfield>
  </datafield>
11. <controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield>
12. <controlfield tag="008">AAMMDDs2012 sp ||||fsm||||0|| 0 eng|c</controlfield>
13. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="020">
  1. <subfield code="a">978-84-695-6254-3</subfield>
  </datafield>
14. <datafield ind1="1" ind2=" " tag="100">
  1. <subfield code="a">Moreno Pichastor, Soledad,</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="e">autor</subfield>
  </datafield>
15. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="300">
  1. <subfield code="a">1 recurs en línia (408 pàgines)</subfield>
  </datafield>
16. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="502">
  1. <subfield code="g">Tesi</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="b">Doctorat</subfield>
  3. <subfield code="c">Universitat Jaume I. Departament de Filologia Anglesa i Romànica</subfield>
  4. <subfield code="d">2009</subfield>
  </datafield>
17. <datafield ind1="2" ind2=" " tag="710">
  1. <subfield code="a">Universitat Jaume I. Departament de Filologia Anglesa i Romànica</subfield>
  </datafield>
18. <datafield ind1=" " ind2="4" tag="655">
  1. <subfield code="a">Tesis i dissertacions electròniques</subfield>
  </datafield>
19. <datafield ind1="1" ind2=" " tag="700">
  1. <subfield code="a">Alcón Soler, Eva,</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="e">supervisor acadèmic</subfield>
  </datafield>
20. <datafield ind1="0" ind2=" " tag="730">
  1. <subfield code="a">TDX</subfield>
  </datafield>
21. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="520">
  1. <subfield code="a">The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</subfield>
  </datafield>
22. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="998">
  1. <subfield code="a">j</subfield>
  </datafield>
23. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="040">
  1. <subfield code="a">ES-BaCBU</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="b">cat</subfield>
  3. <subfield code="e">rda</subfield>
  4. <subfield code="c">ES-BaCBU</subfield>
  </datafield>
24. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="336">
  1. <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="b">txt</subfield>
  3. <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
25. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="337">
  1. <subfield code="a">informàtic</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="b">c</subfield>
  3. <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
26. <datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="338">
  1. <subfield code="a">recurs en línia</subfield>
  2. <subfield code="b">cr</subfield>
  3. <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>

mets

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<mets ID=" DSpace_ITEM_10803-89365" OBJID=" hdl:10803/89365" PROFILE="DSpace METS SIP Profile 1.0" TYPE="DSpace ITEM" schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd">
1. <metsHdr CREATEDATE="2024-10-09T01:29:20Z">
  1. <agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION">
    1. <name>TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)</name>
    </agent>
  </metsHdr>
2. <dmdSec ID="DMD_10803_89365">
  1. <mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS">
    1. <xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
      1. <mods:mods schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
        <mods:name>
        <mods:role>
        <mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
        </mods:role>
        <mods:namePart>Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</mods:namePart>
        </mods:name>
        <mods:name>
        <mods:role>
        <mods:roleTerm type="text">authoremail</mods:roleTerm>
        </mods:role>
        <mods:namePart>solemoreno2000@yahoo.es</mods:namePart>
        </mods:name>
        <mods:name>
        <mods:role>
        <mods:roleTerm type="text">authoremailshow</mods:roleTerm>
        </mods:role>
        <mods:namePart>true</mods:namePart>
        </mods:name>
        <mods:name>
        <mods:role>
        <mods:roleTerm type="text">director</mods:roleTerm>
        </mods:role>
        <mods:namePart>Alcón Soler, Eva</mods:namePart>
        </mods:name>
        <mods:name>
        <mods:role>
        <mods:roleTerm type="text">authorsendemail</mods:roleTerm>
        </mods:role>
        <mods:namePart>true</mods:namePart>
        </mods:name>
        <mods:extension>
        <mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
        </mods:extension>
        <mods:extension>
        <mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</mods:dateAvailable>
        </mods:extension>
        <mods:originInfo>
        <mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2009-09-29</mods:dateIssued>
        </mods:originInfo>
        <mods:identifier type="isbn">978-84-695-6254-3</mods:identifier>
        <mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</mods:identifier>
        <mods:abstract>The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</mods:abstract>
        <mods:language>
        <mods:languageTerm authority="rfc3066">eng</mods:languageTerm>
        </mods:language>
        <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" />
        <mods:subject>
        <mods:topic>evaluation</mods:topic>
        </mods:subject>
        <mods:subject>
        <mods:topic>applied linguistics</mods:topic>
        </mods:subject>
        <mods:subject>
        <mods:topic>rhetorical strategies</mods:topic>
        </mods:subject>
        <mods:subject>
        <mods:topic>praise</mods:topic>
        </mods:subject>
        <mods:subject>
        <mods:topic>criticism</mods:topic>
        </mods:subject>
        <mods:subject>
        <mods:topic>discourse</mods:topic>
        </mods:subject>
        <mods:titleInfo>
        <mods:title>Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</mods:title>
        </mods:titleInfo>
        <mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</mods:genre>
        </mods:mods>
      </xmlData>
    </mdWrap>
  </dmdSec>
3. <amdSec ID="FO_10803_89365_1">
  1. <techMD ID="TECH_O_10803_89365_1">
    1. <mdWrap MDTYPE="PREMIS">
      1. <xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/PREMIS-v1-0.xsd">
        <premis:premis>
        <premis:object>
        <premis:objectIdentifier>
        <premis:objectIdentifierType>URL</premis:objectIdentifierType>
        <premis:objectIdentifierValue>https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/1/solmorpich.pdf</premis:objectIdentifierValue>
        </premis:objectIdentifier>
        <premis:objectCategory>File</premis:objectCategory>
        <premis:objectCharacteristics>
        <premis:fixity>
        <premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>MD5</premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>
        <premis:messageDigest>7d127758ba7bd2b44112db7560f2fd98</premis:messageDigest>
        </premis:fixity>
        <premis:size>1749490</premis:size>
        <premis:format>
        <premis:formatDesignation>
        <premis:formatName>application/pdf</premis:formatName>
        </premis:formatDesignation>
        </premis:format>
        </premis:objectCharacteristics>
        <premis:originalName>solmorpich.pdf</premis:originalName>
        </premis:object>
        </premis:premis>
        </xmlData>
      </mdWrap>
    </techMD>
  </amdSec>
4. <amdSec ID="FT_10803_89365_2">
  1. <techMD ID="TECH_T_10803_89365_2">
    1. <mdWrap MDTYPE="PREMIS">
      1. <xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/PREMIS-v1-0.xsd">
        <premis:premis>
        <premis:object>
        <premis:objectIdentifier>
        <premis:objectIdentifierType>URL</premis:objectIdentifierType>
        <premis:objectIdentifierValue>https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/2/solmorpich.pdf.txt</premis:objectIdentifierValue>
        </premis:objectIdentifier>
        <premis:objectCategory>File</premis:objectCategory>
        <premis:objectCharacteristics>
        <premis:fixity>
        <premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>MD5</premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>
        <premis:messageDigest>e8fea793ec564454e94c93bbff588e25</premis:messageDigest>
        </premis:fixity>
        <premis:size>693080</premis:size>
        <premis:format>
        <premis:formatDesignation>
        <premis:formatName>text/plain</premis:formatName>
        </premis:formatDesignation>
        </premis:format>
        </premis:objectCharacteristics>
        <premis:originalName>solmorpich.pdf.txt</premis:originalName>
        </premis:object>
        </premis:premis>
        </xmlData>
      </mdWrap>
    </techMD>
  </amdSec>
5. <fileSec>
  1. <fileGrp USE="ORIGINAL">
    1. <file ADMID="FO_10803_89365_1" CHECKSUM="7d127758ba7bd2b44112db7560f2fd98" CHECKSUMTYPE="MD5" GROUPID="GROUP_BITSTREAM_10803_89365_1" ID="BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_10803_89365_1" MIMETYPE="application/pdf" SEQ="1" SIZE="1749490">
      1. <FLocat LOCTYPE="URL" href="https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/1/solmorpich.pdf" type="simple" />
      </file>
    </fileGrp>
  2. <fileGrp USE="TEXT">
    1. <file ADMID="FT_10803_89365_2" CHECKSUM="e8fea793ec564454e94c93bbff588e25" CHECKSUMTYPE="MD5" GROUPID="GROUP_BITSTREAM_10803_89365_2" ID="BITSTREAM_TEXT_10803_89365_2" MIMETYPE="text/plain" SEQ="2" SIZE="693080">
      1. <FLocat LOCTYPE="URL" href="https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/2/solmorpich.pdf.txt" type="simple" />
      </file>
    </fileGrp>
  </fileSec>
6. <structMap LABEL="DSpace Object" TYPE="LOGICAL">
  1. <div ADMID="DMD_10803_89365" TYPE="DSpace Object Contents">
    1. <div TYPE="DSpace BITSTREAM">
      1. <fptr FILEID="BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_10803_89365_1" />
      </div>
    </div>
  </structMap>
</mets>

mods

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<mods:mods schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
1. <mods:name>
  1. <mods:namePart>Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</mods:namePart>
  </mods:name>
2. <mods:extension>
  1. <mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</mods:dateAvailable>
  </mods:extension>
3. <mods:extension>
  1. <mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
  </mods:extension>
4. <mods:originInfo>
  1. <mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2009-09-29</mods:dateIssued>
  </mods:originInfo>
5. <mods:identifier type="isbn">978-84-695-6254-3</mods:identifier>
6. <mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</mods:identifier>
7. <mods:abstract>The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</mods:abstract>
8. <mods:language>
  1. <mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
  </mods:language>
9. <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs.</mods:accessCondition>
10. <mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</mods:accessCondition>
11. <mods:subject>
  1. <mods:topic>evaluation</mods:topic>
  </mods:subject>
12. <mods:subject>
  1. <mods:topic>applied linguistics</mods:topic>
  </mods:subject>
13. <mods:subject>
  1. <mods:topic>rhetorical strategies</mods:topic>
  </mods:subject>
14. <mods:subject>
  1. <mods:topic>praise</mods:topic>
  </mods:subject>
15. <mods:subject>
  1. <mods:topic>criticism</mods:topic>
  </mods:subject>
16. <mods:subject>
  1. <mods:topic>discourse</mods:topic>
  </mods:subject>
17. <mods:titleInfo>
  1. <mods:title>Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</mods:title>
  </mods:titleInfo>
18. <mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</mods:genre>
19. <mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>

oaire

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<oaire:record schemaLocation="http://namespaceopenaire.eu/schema/oaire/">
1. <dc:title>Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</dc:title>
2. <datacite:creator>
  1. <datacite:creatorName>Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</datacite:creatorName>
  </datacite:creator>
3. <datacite:contributor>solemoreno2000@yahoo.es</datacite:contributor>
4. <datacite:contributor>true</datacite:contributor>
5. <datacite:contributor>Alcón Soler, Eva</datacite:contributor>
6. <datacite:contributor>true</datacite:contributor>
7. <datacite:contributor>Universitat Jaume I. Departament de Filologia Anglesa i Romànica</datacite:contributor>
8. <dc:subject>evaluation</dc:subject>
9. <dc:subject>applied linguistics</dc:subject>
10. <dc:subject>rhetorical strategies</dc:subject>
11. <dc:subject>praise</dc:subject>
12. <dc:subject>criticism</dc:subject>
13. <dc:subject>discourse</dc:subject>
14. <dc:subject>Anàlisi del discurs (Llingüística Aplicada)</dc:subject>
15. <dc:subject>81</dc:subject>
16. <dc:description>The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</dc:description>
17. <dc:date>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dc:date>
18. <dc:date>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dc:date>
19. <dc:date>2009-09-29</dc:date>
20. <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
21. <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
22. <datacite:alternateIdentifier>978-84-695-6254-3</datacite:alternateIdentifier>
23. <datacite:alternateIdentifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</datacite:alternateIdentifier>
24. <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
25. <dc:rights>ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs.</dc:rights>
26. <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
27. <dc:format>408 p.</dc:format>
28. <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
29. <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
30. <dc:publisher>Universitat Jaume I</dc:publisher>
31. <dc:source>TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)</dc:source>
32. <oaire:file>https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/1/solmorpich.pdf</oaire:file>
</oaire:record>

ore

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<atom:entry schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom http://www.kbcafe.com/rss/atom.xsd.xml">
1. <atom:id>http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365/ore.xml</atom:id>
2. <atom:link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365" rel="alternate" />
3. <atom:link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365/ore.xml" rel="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/describes" />
4. <atom:link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365/ore.xml#atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" />
5. <atom:published>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</atom:published>
6. <atom:updated>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</atom:updated>
7. <atom:source>
  1. <atom:generator>TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)</atom:generator>
  </atom:source>
8. <atom:title>Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</atom:title>
9. <atom:author>
  1. <atom:name>Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</atom:name>
  </atom:author>
10. <atom:category label="Aggregation" scheme="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" term="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/Aggregation" />
11. <atom:category scheme="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/atom/modified" term="2012-10-23T12:03:47Z" />
12. <atom:category label="DSpace Item" scheme="http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/" term="DSpaceItem" />
13. <atom:link href="https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/1/solmorpich.pdf" length="1749490" rel="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/aggregates" title="solmorpich.pdf" type="application/pdf" />
14. <oreatom:triples>
  1. <rdf:Description about="http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365/ore.xml#atom">
    1. <rdf:type resource="http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceItem" />
    2. <dcterms:modified>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dcterms:modified>
    </rdf:Description>
  2. <rdf:Description about="https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/1/solmorpich.pdf">
    1. <rdf:type resource="http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceBitstream" />
    2. <dcterms:description>ORIGINAL</dcterms:description>
    </rdf:Description>
  3. <rdf:Description about="https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/2/solmorpich.pdf.txt">
    1. <rdf:type resource="http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceBitstream" />
    2. <dcterms:description>TEXT</dcterms:description>
    </rdf:Description>
  4. <rdf:Description about="https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/3/solmorpich.pdf.xml">
    1. <rdf:type resource="http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceBitstream" />
    2. <dcterms:description>MEDIA_DOCUMENT</dcterms:description>
    </rdf:Description>
  </oreatom:triples>
</atom:entry>

qdc

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<qdc:qualifieddc schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
1. <dc:title>Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</dc:title>
2. <dc:creator>Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</dc:creator>
3. <dc:contributor>Alcón Soler, Eva</dc:contributor>
4. <dc:subject>evaluation</dc:subject>
5. <dc:subject>applied linguistics</dc:subject>
6. <dc:subject>rhetorical strategies</dc:subject>
7. <dc:subject>praise</dc:subject>
8. <dc:subject>criticism</dc:subject>
9. <dc:subject>discourse</dc:subject>
10. <dcterms:abstract>The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</dcterms:abstract>
11. <dcterms:dateAccepted>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
12. <dcterms:available>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dcterms:available>
13. <dcterms:created>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dcterms:created>
14. <dcterms:issued>2009-09-29</dcterms:issued>
15. <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
16. <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
17. <dc:identifier>978-84-695-6254-3</dc:identifier>
18. <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</dc:identifier>
19. <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
20. <dc:rights>ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs.</dc:rights>
21. <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
22. <dc:publisher>Universitat Jaume I</dc:publisher>
23. <dc:source>TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)</dc:source>
</qdc:qualifieddc>

rdf

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<rdf:RDF schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
1. <ow:Publication about="oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/89365">
  1. <dc:title>Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</dc:title>
  2. <dc:creator>Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</dc:creator>
  3. <dc:contributor>solemoreno2000@yahoo.es</dc:contributor>
  4. <dc:contributor>true</dc:contributor>
  5. <dc:contributor>Alcón Soler, Eva</dc:contributor>
  6. <dc:contributor>true</dc:contributor>
  7. <dc:subject>evaluation</dc:subject>
  8. <dc:subject>applied linguistics</dc:subject>
  9. <dc:subject>rhetorical strategies</dc:subject>
  10. <dc:subject>praise</dc:subject>
  11. <dc:subject>criticism</dc:subject>
  12. <dc:subject>discourse</dc:subject>
  13. <dc:description>The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</dc:description>
  14. <dc:date>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dc:date>
  15. <dc:date>2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</dc:date>
  16. <dc:date>2009-09-29</dc:date>
  17. <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
  18. <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
  19. <dc:identifier>978-84-695-6254-3</dc:identifier>
  20. <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</dc:identifier>
  21. <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  22. <dc:rights>ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs.</dc:rights>
  23. <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  24. <dc:publisher>Universitat Jaume I</dc:publisher>
  25. <dc:source>TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)</dc:source>
  </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>

uketd_dc

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<uketd_dc:uketddc schemaLocation="http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/ http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/ethos-oai/2.0/uketd_dc.xsd">
1. <dc:title>Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</dc:title>
2. <dc:creator>Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</dc:creator>
3. <dcterms:abstract>The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</dcterms:abstract>
4. <uketdterms:institution>Universitat Jaume I</uketdterms:institution>
5. <dcterms:issued>2009-09-29</dcterms:issued>
6. <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
7. <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
8. <dc:language type="dcterms:ISO639-2">eng</dc:language>
9. <dcterms:isReferencedBy>http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
10. <dc:identifier type="dcterms:URI">https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/1/solmorpich.pdf</dc:identifier>
11. <uketdterms:checksum type="uketdterms:MD5">7d127758ba7bd2b44112db7560f2fd98</uketdterms:checksum>
12. <dcterms:hasFormat>https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/2/solmorpich.pdf.txt</dcterms:hasFormat>
13. <uketdterms:checksum type="uketdterms:MD5">e8fea793ec564454e94c93bbff588e25</uketdterms:checksum>
14. <uketdterms:embargodate>cap</uketdterms:embargodate>
15. <dc:subject>evaluation</dc:subject>
16. <dc:subject>applied linguistics</dc:subject>
17. <dc:subject>rhetorical strategies</dc:subject>
18. <dc:subject>praise</dc:subject>
19. <dc:subject>criticism</dc:subject>
20. <dc:subject>discourse</dc:subject>
21. <dc:subject>Anàlisi del discurs (Llingüística Aplicada)</dc:subject>
22. <dc:identifier>978-84-695-6254-3</dc:identifier>
</uketd_dc:uketddc>

xoai

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<metadata schemaLocation="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai http://www.lyncode.com/xsd/xoai.xsd">
1. <element name="dc">
  1. <element name="contributor">
    1. <element name="none">
      1. <field name="value">Universitat Jaume I. Departament de Filologia Anglesa i Romànica</field>
      </element>
    2. <element name="author">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">Moreno Pichastor, Soledad</field>
        <field name="authority">19965b3c-3b8d-4c7d-bd53-cb27608e4d11</field>
        <field name="confidence">-1</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    3. <element name="authoremail">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">solemoreno2000@yahoo.es</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    4. <element name="authoremailshow">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">true</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    5. <element name="director">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">Alcón Soler, Eva</field>
        <field name="authority">064b4c9a-fece-4e00-9d7a-86f3ed29b35f</field>
        <field name="confidence">-1</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    6. <element name="authorsendemail">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">true</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  2. <element name="date">
    1. <element name="accessioned">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    2. <element name="available">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">2012-10-23T12:03:47Z</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    3. <element name="issued">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">2009-09-29</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  3. <element name="identifier">
    1. <element name="isbn">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">978-84-695-6254-3</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    2. <element name="uri">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">http://hdl.handle.net/10803/89365</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  4. <element name="description">
    1. <element name="abstract">
      1. <element name="eng">
        <field name="value">The present dissertation deals with the analysis of rhetorical strategies of evaluation used in the "response" article in the field of applied linguistics. Based on a genre approach to discourse, our study shows how writers favour specific linguistic and rhetorical resources to produce critical comments in relation to another author's work. The results of this investigation show that patterns of praise and criticism are balanced within the genre of the "response" article to create a specific kind of interaction with the author of the reviewed text. Second, findings also reval that devices such as hedging, boosting and certain types of stance bundles are employed to convey the writer's deference, assertiveness and personal tone of comments. More specifically, the role and distribution of these devices is seen to vary in connection with different contexts of evaluation, ranging from positive to negative choices. In addition, our analysis emphasises the highly personal and controversial tone of the "response" article aimed at creating debate. Finally, our study suggests that the actual discourse context, the writer's preferences and the norms favoured within an academic community create a complex interplay of features that influences the subtlety of writer's critical comments.</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  5. <element name="format">
    1. <element name="extent">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">408 p.</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    2. <element name="mimetype">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">application/pdf</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  6. <element name="language">
    1. <element name="iso">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">eng</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  7. <element name="publisher">
    1. <element name="none">
      1. <field name="value">Universitat Jaume I</field>
      </element>
    </element>
  8. <element name="rights">
    1. <element name="license">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs.</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    2. <element name="accessLevel">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  9. <element name="source">
    1. <element name="none">
      1. <field name="value">TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)</field>
      </element>
    </element>
  10. <element name="subject">
    1. <element name="none">
      1. <field name="value">evaluation</field>
      2. <field name="value">applied linguistics</field>
      3. <field name="value">rhetorical strategies</field>
      4. <field name="value">praise</field>
      5. <field name="value">criticism</field>
      6. <field name="value">discourse</field>
      </element>
    2. <element name="other">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">Anàlisi del discurs (Llingüística Aplicada)</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    3. <element name="udc">
      1. <element name="cat">
        <field name="value">81</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  11. <element name="title">
    1. <element name="none">
      1. <field name="value">Academic Evaluation within the Applied Linguistics response Article: An Analysis of Writer Mediated Praise and Criticism as Rhetorical strategies</field>
      </element>
    </element>
  12. <element name="type">
    1. <element name="none">
      1. <field name="value">info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</field>
      2. <field name="value">info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</field>
      </element>
    </element>
  13. <element name="embargo">
    1. <element name="terms">
      1. <element name="none">
        <field name="value">cap</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  </element>
2. <element name="bundles">
  1. <element name="bundle">
    1. <field name="name">ORIGINAL</field>
    2. <element name="bitstreams">
      1. <element name="bitstream">
        <field name="name">solmorpich.pdf</field>
        <field name="originalName">solmorpich.pdf</field>
        <field name="format">application/pdf</field>
        <field name="size">1749490</field>
        <field name="url">https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/1/solmorpich.pdf</field>
        <field name="checksum">7d127758ba7bd2b44112db7560f2fd98</field>
        <field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
        <field name="sid">1</field>
        <field name="drm">open access</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  2. <element name="bundle">
    1. <field name="name">TEXT</field>
    2. <element name="bitstreams">
      1. <element name="bitstream">
        <field name="name">solmorpich.pdf.txt</field>
        <field name="originalName">solmorpich.pdf.txt</field>
        <field name="description">Extracted Text</field>
        <field name="format">text/plain</field>
        <field name="size">693080</field>
        <field name="url">https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/2/solmorpich.pdf.txt</field>
        <field name="checksum">e8fea793ec564454e94c93bbff588e25</field>
        <field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
        <field name="sid">2</field>
        <field name="drm">open access</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  3. <element name="bundle">
    1. <field name="name">MEDIA_DOCUMENT</field>
    2. <element name="bitstreams">
      1. <element name="bitstream">
        <field name="name">solmorpich.pdf.xml</field>
        <field name="originalName">solmorpich.pdf.xml</field>
        <field name="description">Document Consulta</field>
        <field name="format">text/xml</field>
        <field name="size">105</field>
        <field name="url">https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/89365/3/solmorpich.pdf.xml</field>
        <field name="checksum">f726740e8b7b2b90e0eb86938a6be914</field>
        <field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
        <field name="sid">3</field>
        <field name="drm">open access</field>
        </element>
      </element>
    </element>
  </element>
3. <element name="others">
  1. <field name="handle">10803/89365</field>
  2. <field name="identifier">oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/89365</field>
  3. <field name="lastModifyDate">2023-06-09 21:15:07.087</field>
  4. <field name="drm">open access</field>
  </element>
4. <element name="repository">
  1. <field name="name">TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)</field>
  2. <field name="mail">pir@csuc.cat</field>
  </element>
</metadata>