<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Arribas, Sonia</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Kropotkin</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anarchism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inequality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fiction</dc:subject>
<dc:description>I analyse Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread, focusing on the symbol of ‘bread’. This allows me to offer a reading of it that is different from the way in which it is usually read – as a revolutionary programme anchored in the belief in scientific progress. In my view, we should rather take it as literature, the fruit of Kropotkin’s imagination. I explain how ‘bread’ serves different functions: it is a rhetorical device; it is a link between the natural and the social; it serves as a representation of materiality as opposed to mere ideas; it conveys the satisfaction of needs; it represents the specific form of anarchism defended by Kropotkin; it serves him to argue against the political economy of his time; and it functions as the foundation of ethics. I also read the book backwards, starting from its last sentences, where Kropotkin denies that he is writing fiction. I take this as a Freudian negation, and argue that the book can only be read today as literature. Kropotkin himself acknowledges in several places that his own writing is being led not so much by the scientific method that he advocates, but by the free powers of the imagination.</dc:description>
<dc:description>This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [FFI2015-70273-P]; Ajut Cofre Humanitats Pompeu Fabra University [2018].</dc:description>
<dc:date>2020</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Arribas S. 'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times. Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0039-3274</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60946</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55.</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studia Neophilologica on 10 Apr 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:publisher>Taylor & Francis</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<d:DIDL schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
<d:DIDLInfo>
<dcterms:created schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</dcterms:created>
</d:DIDLInfo>
<d:Item id="hdl_10230_60946">
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<dii:Identifier schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:10230/60946</dii:Identifier>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Arribas, Sonia</dc:creator>
<dc:description>I analyse Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread, focusing on the symbol of ‘bread’. This allows me to offer a reading of it that is different from the way in which it is usually read – as a revolutionary programme anchored in the belief in scientific progress. In my view, we should rather take it as literature, the fruit of Kropotkin’s imagination. I explain how ‘bread’ serves different functions: it is a rhetorical device; it is a link between the natural and the social; it serves as a representation of materiality as opposed to mere ideas; it conveys the satisfaction of needs; it represents the specific form of anarchism defended by Kropotkin; it serves him to argue against the political economy of his time; and it functions as the foundation of ethics. I also read the book backwards, starting from its last sentences, where Kropotkin denies that he is writing fiction. I take this as a Freudian negation, and argue that the book can only be read today as literature. Kropotkin himself acknowledges in several places that his own writing is being led not so much by the scientific method that he advocates, but by the free powers of the imagination.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2020</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Arribas S. 'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times. Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0039-3274</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60946</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55.</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studia Neophilologica on 10 Apr 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Taylor & Francis</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Component id="10230_60946_1">
</d:Component>
</d:Item>
</d:DIDL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<dim:dim schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
<dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="author">Arribas, Sonia</dim:field>
<dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="accessioned">2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</dim:field>
<dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="available">2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</dim:field>
<dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="issued">2020</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="citation">Arribas S. 'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times. Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="issn">0039-3274</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60946</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="doi">http://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dim:field>
<dim:field element="description" mdschema="dc" qualifier="abstract">I analyse Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread, focusing on the symbol of ‘bread’. This allows me to offer a reading of it that is different from the way in which it is usually read – as a revolutionary programme anchored in the belief in scientific progress. In my view, we should rather take it as literature, the fruit of Kropotkin’s imagination. I explain how ‘bread’ serves different functions: it is a rhetorical device; it is a link between the natural and the social; it serves as a representation of materiality as opposed to mere ideas; it conveys the satisfaction of needs; it represents the specific form of anarchism defended by Kropotkin; it serves him to argue against the political economy of his time; and it functions as the foundation of ethics. I also read the book backwards, starting from its last sentences, where Kropotkin denies that he is writing fiction. I take this as a Freudian negation, and argue that the book can only be read today as literature. Kropotkin himself acknowledges in several places that his own writing is being led not so much by the scientific method that he advocates, but by the free powers of the imagination.</dim:field>
<dim:field element="description" lang="en" mdschema="dc" qualifier="provenance">Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-29T06:54:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Arribas_stu_bito.pdf: 317760 bytes, checksum: 59a9aec4f304804c63e962f881060733 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020</dim:field>
<dim:field element="description" mdschema="dc" qualifier="sponsorship">This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [FFI2015-70273-P]; Ajut Cofre Humanitats Pompeu Fabra University [2018].</dim:field>
<dim:field element="format" mdschema="dc" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
<dim:field element="language" mdschema="dc" qualifier="iso">eng</dim:field>
<dim:field element="publisher" mdschema="dc">Taylor & Francis</dim:field>
<dim:field element="relation" mdschema="dc" qualifier="ispartof">Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55.</dim:field>
<dim:field element="relation" mdschema="dc" qualifier="projectID">info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</dim:field>
<dim:field element="rights" mdschema="dc">© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studia Neophilologica on 10 Apr 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dim:field>
<dim:field element="rights" mdschema="dc" qualifier="accessRights">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dim:field>
<dim:field element="title" mdschema="dc">'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</dim:field>
<dim:field element="type" mdschema="dc">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dim:field>
<dim:field element="type" mdschema="dc" qualifier="version">info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</dim:field>
<dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="keyword">Kropotkin</dim:field>
<dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="keyword">Anarchism</dim:field>
<dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="keyword">Inequality</dim:field>
<dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="keyword">Literature</dim:field>
<dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="keyword">Fiction</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<thesis schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
<title>'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</title>
<creator>Arribas, Sonia</creator>
<description>I analyse Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread, focusing on the symbol of ‘bread’. This allows me to offer a reading of it that is different from the way in which it is usually read – as a revolutionary programme anchored in the belief in scientific progress. In my view, we should rather take it as literature, the fruit of Kropotkin’s imagination. I explain how ‘bread’ serves different functions: it is a rhetorical device; it is a link between the natural and the social; it serves as a representation of materiality as opposed to mere ideas; it conveys the satisfaction of needs; it represents the specific form of anarchism defended by Kropotkin; it serves him to argue against the political economy of his time; and it functions as the foundation of ethics. I also read the book backwards, starting from its last sentences, where Kropotkin denies that he is writing fiction. I take this as a Freudian negation, and argue that the book can only be read today as literature. Kropotkin himself acknowledges in several places that his own writing is being led not so much by the scientific method that he advocates, but by the free powers of the imagination.</description>
<date>2024-08-29</date>
<date>2024-08-29</date>
<date>2020</date>
<type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</type>
<identifier>Arribas S. 'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times. Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</identifier>
<identifier>0039-3274</identifier>
<identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60946</identifier>
<identifier>http://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</identifier>
<language>eng</language>
<relation>Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55.</relation>
<relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</relation>
<rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights>
<rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studia Neophilologica on 10 Apr 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</rights>
<publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher>
</thesis>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<record schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="042">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Arribas, Sonia</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="260">
<subfield code="c">2020</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="520">
<subfield code="a">I analyse Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread, focusing on the symbol of ‘bread’. This allows me to offer a reading of it that is different from the way in which it is usually read – as a revolutionary programme anchored in the belief in scientific progress. In my view, we should rather take it as literature, the fruit of Kropotkin’s imagination. I explain how ‘bread’ serves different functions: it is a rhetorical device; it is a link between the natural and the social; it serves as a representation of materiality as opposed to mere ideas; it conveys the satisfaction of needs; it represents the specific form of anarchism defended by Kropotkin; it serves him to argue against the political economy of his time; and it functions as the foundation of ethics. I also read the book backwards, starting from its last sentences, where Kropotkin denies that he is writing fiction. I take this as a Freudian negation, and argue that the book can only be read today as literature. Kropotkin himself acknowledges in several places that his own writing is being led not so much by the scientific method that he advocates, but by the free powers of the imagination.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">Arribas S. 'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times. Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">0039-3274</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60946</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">http://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="0" ind2="0" tag="245">
<subfield code="a">'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<mets ID=" DSpace_ITEM_10230-60946" OBJID=" hdl:10230/60946" PROFILE="DSpace METS SIP Profile 1.0" TYPE="DSpace ITEM" schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd">
<metsHdr CREATEDATE="2024-09-26T10:59:07Z">
<agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION">
<name>Repositori digital de la UPF</name>
</agent>
</metsHdr>
<dmdSec ID="DMD_10230_60946">
<mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS">
<xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:mods schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Arribas, Sonia</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
</mods:extension>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</mods:dateAvailable>
</mods:extension>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2020</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:identifier type="citation">Arribas S. 'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times. Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="issn">0039-3274</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60946</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="doi">http://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>I analyse Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread, focusing on the symbol of ‘bread’. This allows me to offer a reading of it that is different from the way in which it is usually read – as a revolutionary programme anchored in the belief in scientific progress. In my view, we should rather take it as literature, the fruit of Kropotkin’s imagination. I explain how ‘bread’ serves different functions: it is a rhetorical device; it is a link between the natural and the social; it serves as a representation of materiality as opposed to mere ideas; it conveys the satisfaction of needs; it represents the specific form of anarchism defended by Kropotkin; it serves him to argue against the political economy of his time; and it functions as the foundation of ethics. I also read the book backwards, starting from its last sentences, where Kropotkin denies that he is writing fiction. I take this as a Freudian negation, and argue that the book can only be read today as literature. Kropotkin himself acknowledges in several places that his own writing is being led not so much by the scientific method that he advocates, but by the free powers of the imagination.</mods:abstract>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm authority="rfc3066">eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studia Neophilologica on 10 Apr 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>
</xmlData>
</mdWrap>
</dmdSec>
<amdSec ID="FO_10230_60946_1">
<techMD ID="TECH_O_10230_60946_1">
<mdWrap MDTYPE="PREMIS">
<xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/PREMIS-v1-0.xsd">
<premis:premis>
<premis:object>
<premis:objectIdentifier>
<premis:objectIdentifierType>URL</premis:objectIdentifierType>
<premis:objectIdentifierValue>http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/60946/1/Arribas_stu_bito.pdf</premis:objectIdentifierValue>
</premis:objectIdentifier>
<premis:objectCategory>File</premis:objectCategory>
<premis:objectCharacteristics>
<premis:fixity>
<premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>MD5</premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>
<premis:messageDigest>59a9aec4f304804c63e962f881060733</premis:messageDigest>
</premis:fixity>
<premis:size>317760</premis:size>
<premis:format>
<premis:formatDesignation>
<premis:formatName>application/pdf</premis:formatName>
</premis:formatDesignation>
</premis:format>
</premis:objectCharacteristics>
<premis:originalName>Arribas_stu_bito.pdf</premis:originalName>
</premis:object>
</premis:premis>
</xmlData>
</mdWrap>
</techMD>
</amdSec>
<fileSec>
<fileGrp USE="ORIGINAL">
<file ADMID="FO_10230_60946_1" CHECKSUM="59a9aec4f304804c63e962f881060733" CHECKSUMTYPE="MD5" GROUPID="GROUP_BITSTREAM_10230_60946_1" ID="BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_10230_60946_1" MIMETYPE="application/pdf" SEQ="1" SIZE="317760">
</file>
</fileGrp>
</fileSec>
<structMap LABEL="DSpace Object" TYPE="LOGICAL">
<div ADMID="DMD_10230_60946" TYPE="DSpace Object Contents">
<div TYPE="DSpace BITSTREAM">
</div>
</div>
</structMap>
</mets>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<mods:mods schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Arribas, Sonia</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</mods:dateAvailable>
</mods:extension>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
</mods:extension>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2020</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:identifier type="citation">Arribas S. 'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times. Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="issn">0039-3274</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60946</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="doi">http://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>I analyse Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread, focusing on the symbol of ‘bread’. This allows me to offer a reading of it that is different from the way in which it is usually read – as a revolutionary programme anchored in the belief in scientific progress. In my view, we should rather take it as literature, the fruit of Kropotkin’s imagination. I explain how ‘bread’ serves different functions: it is a rhetorical device; it is a link between the natural and the social; it serves as a representation of materiality as opposed to mere ideas; it conveys the satisfaction of needs; it represents the specific form of anarchism defended by Kropotkin; it serves him to argue against the political economy of his time; and it functions as the foundation of ethics. I also read the book backwards, starting from its last sentences, where Kropotkin denies that he is writing fiction. I take this as a Freudian negation, and argue that the book can only be read today as literature. Kropotkin himself acknowledges in several places that his own writing is being led not so much by the scientific method that he advocates, but by the free powers of the imagination.</mods:abstract>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studia Neophilologica on 10 Apr 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<atom:entry schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom http://www.kbcafe.com/rss/atom.xsd.xml">
<atom:id>http://oai-repositori.upf.edu/oai/metadata/handle/10230/60946/ore.xml</atom:id>
<atom:published>2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</atom:published>
<atom:updated>2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</atom:updated>
<atom:source>
<atom:generator>Repositori digital de la UPF</atom:generator>
</atom:source>
<atom:title>'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</atom:title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Arribas, Sonia</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<oreatom:triples>
<rdf:Description about="http://oai-repositori.upf.edu/oai/metadata/handle/10230/60946/ore.xml#atom">
<dcterms:modified>2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</dcterms:modified>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/60946/2/Arribas_stu_bito.pdf.jpg">
<dcterms:description>THUMBNAIL</dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/60946/1/Arribas_stu_bito.pdf">
<dcterms:description>ORIGINAL</dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description>
</oreatom:triples>
</atom:entry>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<qdc:qualifieddc schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
<dc:title>'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Arribas, Sonia</dc:creator>
<dcterms:abstract>I analyse Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread, focusing on the symbol of ‘bread’. This allows me to offer a reading of it that is different from the way in which it is usually read – as a revolutionary programme anchored in the belief in scientific progress. In my view, we should rather take it as literature, the fruit of Kropotkin’s imagination. I explain how ‘bread’ serves different functions: it is a rhetorical device; it is a link between the natural and the social; it serves as a representation of materiality as opposed to mere ideas; it conveys the satisfaction of needs; it represents the specific form of anarchism defended by Kropotkin; it serves him to argue against the political economy of his time; and it functions as the foundation of ethics. I also read the book backwards, starting from its last sentences, where Kropotkin denies that he is writing fiction. I take this as a Freudian negation, and argue that the book can only be read today as literature. Kropotkin himself acknowledges in several places that his own writing is being led not so much by the scientific method that he advocates, but by the free powers of the imagination.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:date>2020</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Arribas S. 'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times. Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0039-3274</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60946</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55.</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studia Neophilologica on 10 Apr 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Taylor & Francis</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
<ow:Publication about="oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/60946">
<dc:title>'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Arribas, Sonia</dc:creator>
<dc:description>I analyse Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread, focusing on the symbol of ‘bread’. This allows me to offer a reading of it that is different from the way in which it is usually read – as a revolutionary programme anchored in the belief in scientific progress. In my view, we should rather take it as literature, the fruit of Kropotkin’s imagination. I explain how ‘bread’ serves different functions: it is a rhetorical device; it is a link between the natural and the social; it serves as a representation of materiality as opposed to mere ideas; it conveys the satisfaction of needs; it represents the specific form of anarchism defended by Kropotkin; it serves him to argue against the political economy of his time; and it functions as the foundation of ethics. I also read the book backwards, starting from its last sentences, where Kropotkin denies that he is writing fiction. I take this as a Freudian negation, and argue that the book can only be read today as literature. Kropotkin himself acknowledges in several places that his own writing is being led not so much by the scientific method that he advocates, but by the free powers of the imagination.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2020</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Arribas S. 'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times. Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0039-3274</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60946</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55.</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studia Neophilologica on 10 Apr 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Taylor & Francis</dc:publisher>
</ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<metadata schemaLocation="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai http://www.lyncode.com/xsd/xoai.xsd">
<element name="dc">
<element name="contributor">
<element name="author">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Arribas, Sonia</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="date">
<element name="accessioned">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="available">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">2024-08-29T06:54:19Z</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="issued">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">2020</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="identifier">
<element name="citation">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Arribas S. 'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times. Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="issn">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">0039-3274</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="uri">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60946</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="doi">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">http://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="description">
<element name="abstract">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">I analyse Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread, focusing on the symbol of ‘bread’. This allows me to offer a reading of it that is different from the way in which it is usually read – as a revolutionary programme anchored in the belief in scientific progress. In my view, we should rather take it as literature, the fruit of Kropotkin’s imagination. I explain how ‘bread’ serves different functions: it is a rhetorical device; it is a link between the natural and the social; it serves as a representation of materiality as opposed to mere ideas; it conveys the satisfaction of needs; it represents the specific form of anarchism defended by Kropotkin; it serves him to argue against the political economy of his time; and it functions as the foundation of ethics. I also read the book backwards, starting from its last sentences, where Kropotkin denies that he is writing fiction. I take this as a Freudian negation, and argue that the book can only be read today as literature. Kropotkin himself acknowledges in several places that his own writing is being led not so much by the scientific method that he advocates, but by the free powers of the imagination.</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="provenance">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-29T06:54:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Arribas_stu_bito.pdf: 317760 bytes, checksum: 59a9aec4f304804c63e962f881060733 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="sponsorship">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad [FFI2015-70273-P]; Ajut Cofre Humanitats Pompeu Fabra University [2018].</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="format">
<element name="mimetype">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">application/pdf</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="language">
<element name="iso">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">eng</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="publisher">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Taylor & Francis</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="relation">
<element name="ispartof">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Studia Neophilologica. 2020;92(2):238-55.</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="projectID">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="rights">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studia Neophilologica on 10 Apr 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00393274.2020.1751699</field>
</element>
<element name="accessRights">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="title">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">'A bit of bread and cheese': what people eat in revolutionary times</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="type">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</field>
</element>
<element name="version">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="subject">
<element name="keyword">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Kropotkin</field>
<field name="value">Anarchism</field>
<field name="value">Inequality</field>
<field name="value">Literature</field>
<field name="value">Fiction</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="bundles">
<element name="bundle">
<field name="name">THUMBNAIL</field>
<element name="bitstreams">
<element name="bitstream">
<field name="name">Arribas_stu_bito.pdf.jpg</field>
<field name="originalName">Arribas_stu_bito.pdf.jpg</field>
<field name="description">IM Thumbnail</field>
<field name="format">image/jpeg</field>
<field name="size">16118</field>
<field name="url">http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/60946/2/Arribas_stu_bito.pdf.jpg</field>
<field name="checksum">de0b3c9a8ef14bfe25e64082656e2c39</field>
<field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
<field name="sid">2</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="bundle">
<field name="name">ORIGINAL</field>
<element name="bitstreams">
<element name="bitstream">
<field name="name">Arribas_stu_bito.pdf</field>
<field name="format">application/pdf</field>
<field name="size">317760</field>
<field name="url">http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/60946/1/Arribas_stu_bito.pdf</field>
<field name="checksum">59a9aec4f304804c63e962f881060733</field>
<field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
<field name="sid">1</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="others">
<field name="handle">10230/60946</field>
<field name="identifier">oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/60946</field>
<field name="lastModifyDate">2024-08-30 03:31:09.964</field>
</element>
<element name="repository">
<field name="name">Repositori digital de la UPF</field>
<field name="mail">repositori@upf.edu</field>
</element>
</metadata>