<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Birnbaum, Yochai</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Fiol Sala, Miquel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Nikus, Kjell</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Garcia Niebla, Javier</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bacharova, Ljuba</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Dubner, Sergio</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Zareba, Wojciech</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Macfarlane, Peter W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Cygankiewicz, Iwona</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bayes de Luna, Antoni</dc:creator>
<dc:description>The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (FUDMI) [published simultaneously in 2018 in numerous journals including Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal] focuses mainly on the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI), along with the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, in order to define the etiology of myocardial injury. As a consequence, there is less emphasis on updating the parts of the definition concerning the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes related to MI. Evidence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MI and the ECG is the main available tool for i) detecting acute ischemia, ii) triage and iii) risk stratification upon presentation. This review focuses on multiple aspects of ECG interpretation that we firmly believe should be considered for incorporation in any future update to the Universal Definition of MI. Our counterpoint view is that: a) the use of the ECG following coronary artery bypass surgery should be better explored and defined; b) the emphasis in the FUDMI on convex versus concave ST-elevation, which is questionable, should be balanced by the fact that many patients with true ST-elevation MI (STEMI) present with a concave form of ST elevation; c) reciprocal ST-depression in STEMI caused by right coronary artery or left circumflex artery occlusion, should be set against the fact that not all anterior STEMIs present with reciprocal ST-depression which can also be seen in cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy; d) the posterior leads V7-V9 should be placed on a horizontal line from V4, rather than follow the 5th intercostal space; e) ST-depression in V1-V3 is not a manifestation of ischemia of the basal inferior segment, placed horizontally; f) Interpreting ST-T changes in patients with conduction abnormalities and pacemakers should be further defined.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2020-05</dc:date>
<dc:type>review article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Birnbaum Yochai, Fiol Miguel, Nikus Kjell, Garcia Niebla Javier, Bacharova Ljuba, Dubner Sergio, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 May;60:142-147. Epub 2020 Apr 18.</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0022-0736</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>1532-8430</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>32361523</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>L2005716873</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>2-s2.0-85083892583</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>000543005800028</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Churchill Livingstone Inc Medical Publishers</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<d:DIDL schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
<d:DIDLInfo>
<dcterms:created schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dcterms:created>
</d:DIDLInfo>
<d:Item id="hdl_20.500.13003_10776">
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<dii:Identifier schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:20.500.13003/10776</dii:Identifier>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Birnbaum, Yochai</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Fiol Sala, Miquel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Nikus, Kjell</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Garcia Niebla, Javier</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bacharova, Ljuba</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Dubner, Sergio</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Zareba, Wojciech</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Macfarlane, Peter W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Cygankiewicz, Iwona</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bayes de Luna, Antoni</dc:creator>
<dc:description>The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (FUDMI) [published simultaneously in 2018 in numerous journals including Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal] focuses mainly on the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI), along with the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, in order to define the etiology of myocardial injury. As a consequence, there is less emphasis on updating the parts of the definition concerning the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes related to MI. Evidence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MI and the ECG is the main available tool for i) detecting acute ischemia, ii) triage and iii) risk stratification upon presentation. This review focuses on multiple aspects of ECG interpretation that we firmly believe should be considered for incorporation in any future update to the Universal Definition of MI. Our counterpoint view is that: a) the use of the ECG following coronary artery bypass surgery should be better explored and defined; b) the emphasis in the FUDMI on convex versus concave ST-elevation, which is questionable, should be balanced by the fact that many patients with true ST-elevation MI (STEMI) present with a concave form of ST elevation; c) reciprocal ST-depression in STEMI caused by right coronary artery or left circumflex artery occlusion, should be set against the fact that not all anterior STEMIs present with reciprocal ST-depression which can also be seen in cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy; d) the posterior leads V7-V9 should be placed on a horizontal line from V4, rather than follow the 5th intercostal space; e) ST-depression in V1-V3 is not a manifestation of ischemia of the basal inferior segment, placed horizontally; f) Interpreting ST-T changes in patients with conduction abnormalities and pacemakers should be further defined.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2020-05</dc:date>
<dc:type>review article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Birnbaum Yochai, Fiol Miguel, Nikus Kjell, Garcia Niebla Javier, Bacharova Ljuba, Dubner Sergio, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 May;60:142-147. Epub 2020 Apr 18.</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0022-0736</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>1532-8430</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>32361523</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>L2005716873</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>2-s2.0-85083892583</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>000543005800028</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Churchill Livingstone Inc Medical Publishers</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Component id="20.500.13003_10776_1">
</d:Component>
</d:Item>
</d:DIDL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<dim:dim schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
<dim:field authority="a51c6d2e-cd7d-4577-a36f-cbf5887c4c60" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="" qualifier="author">Birnbaum, Yochai</dim:field>
<dim:field authority="241" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="0000-0002-5370-1391" qualifier="author">Fiol Sala, Miquel</dim:field>
<dim:field authority="ab240269-010f-414a-baba-346b8f4f7d57" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="" qualifier="author">Nikus, Kjell</dim:field>
<dim:field authority="31c03ab7-1c86-4b0c-b0ba-ea7ff3df521f" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="" qualifier="author">Garcia Niebla, Javier</dim:field>
<dim:field authority="aeb44617-21cd-4695-bae0-622da45a8b5b" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="" qualifier="author">Bacharova, Ljuba</dim:field>
<dim:field authority="151b255e-f3ca-4156-8f42-c3b40338efee" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="" qualifier="author">Dubner, Sergio</dim:field>
<dim:field authority="378058c7-0b38-4693-85ea-23fdeb82ca9d" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="" qualifier="author">Zareba, Wojciech</dim:field>
<dim:field authority="be949326-a881-4943-932d-0aef66b0780d" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="" qualifier="author">Macfarlane, Peter W.</dim:field>
<dim:field authority="b37127a8-b355-4bb3-be5f-fe1e76a59a54" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="" qualifier="author">Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</dim:field>
<dim:field authority="5e64fef1-06fd-47ea-98ad-c06cb6eb05d8" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="" qualifier="author">Cygankiewicz, Iwona</dim:field>
<dim:field authority="5964904b-271e-421c-ae63-5531e9e16d42" confidence="500" element="contributor" mdschema="dc" orcid_id="" qualifier="author">Bayes de Luna, Antoni</dim:field>
<dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="accessioned">2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dim:field>
<dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="available">2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dim:field>
<dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="issued">2020-05</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" lang="en" mdschema="dc" qualifier="citation">Birnbaum Yochai, Fiol Miguel, Nikus Kjell, Garcia Niebla Javier, Bacharova Ljuba, Dubner Sergio, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 May;60:142-147. Epub 2020 Apr 18.</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="issn">0022-0736</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="doi">10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="essn">1532-8430</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="pmid">32361523</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="pui">L2005716873</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="scopus">2-s2.0-85083892583</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="wos">000543005800028</dim:field>
<dim:field element="description" lang="en" mdschema="dc" qualifier="abstract">The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (FUDMI) [published simultaneously in 2018 in numerous journals including Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal] focuses mainly on the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI), along with the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, in order to define the etiology of myocardial injury. As a consequence, there is less emphasis on updating the parts of the definition concerning the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes related to MI. Evidence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MI and the ECG is the main available tool for i) detecting acute ischemia, ii) triage and iii) risk stratification upon presentation. This review focuses on multiple aspects of ECG interpretation that we firmly believe should be considered for incorporation in any future update to the Universal Definition of MI. Our counterpoint view is that: a) the use of the ECG following coronary artery bypass surgery should be better explored and defined; b) the emphasis in the FUDMI on convex versus concave ST-elevation, which is questionable, should be balanced by the fact that many patients with true ST-elevation MI (STEMI) present with a concave form of ST elevation; c) reciprocal ST-depression in STEMI caused by right coronary artery or left circumflex artery occlusion, should be set against the fact that not all anterior STEMIs present with reciprocal ST-depression which can also be seen in cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy; d) the posterior leads V7-V9 should be placed on a horizontal line from V4, rather than follow the 5th intercostal space; e) ST-depression in V1-V3 is not a manifestation of ischemia of the basal inferior segment, placed horizontally; f) Interpreting ST-T changes in patients with conduction abnormalities and pacemakers should be further defined.</dim:field>
<dim:field element="language" lang="en" mdschema="dc" qualifier="iso">eng</dim:field>
<dim:field element="publisher" lang="en" mdschema="dc">Churchill Livingstone Inc Medical Publishers</dim:field>
<dim:field element="rights" mdschema="dc" qualifier="uri">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dim:field>
<dim:field element="title" lang="en" mdschema="dc">A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</dim:field>
<dim:field element="type" lang="en" mdschema="dc">review article</dim:field>
<dim:field element="journal" lang="en" mdschema="dc" qualifier="title">Journal of Electrocardiology</dim:field>
<dim:field element="page" lang="en" mdschema="dc" qualifier="initial">142</dim:field>
<dim:field element="page" lang="en" mdschema="dc" qualifier="final">147</dim:field>
<dim:field element="relation" lang="en" mdschema="dc" qualifier="publisherversion">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</dim:field>
<dim:field element="volume" lang="en" mdschema="dc" qualifier="number">60</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<thesis schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
<title>A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</title>
<creator>Birnbaum, Yochai</creator>
<creator>Fiol Sala, Miquel</creator>
<creator>Nikus, Kjell</creator>
<creator>Garcia Niebla, Javier</creator>
<creator>Bacharova, Ljuba</creator>
<creator>Dubner, Sergio</creator>
<creator>Zareba, Wojciech</creator>
<creator>Macfarlane, Peter W.</creator>
<creator>Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</creator>
<creator>Cygankiewicz, Iwona</creator>
<creator>Bayes de Luna, Antoni</creator>
<description>The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (FUDMI) [published simultaneously in 2018 in numerous journals including Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal] focuses mainly on the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI), along with the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, in order to define the etiology of myocardial injury. As a consequence, there is less emphasis on updating the parts of the definition concerning the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes related to MI. Evidence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MI and the ECG is the main available tool for i) detecting acute ischemia, ii) triage and iii) risk stratification upon presentation. This review focuses on multiple aspects of ECG interpretation that we firmly believe should be considered for incorporation in any future update to the Universal Definition of MI. Our counterpoint view is that: a) the use of the ECG following coronary artery bypass surgery should be better explored and defined; b) the emphasis in the FUDMI on convex versus concave ST-elevation, which is questionable, should be balanced by the fact that many patients with true ST-elevation MI (STEMI) present with a concave form of ST elevation; c) reciprocal ST-depression in STEMI caused by right coronary artery or left circumflex artery occlusion, should be set against the fact that not all anterior STEMIs present with reciprocal ST-depression which can also be seen in cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy; d) the posterior leads V7-V9 should be placed on a horizontal line from V4, rather than follow the 5th intercostal space; e) ST-depression in V1-V3 is not a manifestation of ischemia of the basal inferior segment, placed horizontally; f) Interpreting ST-T changes in patients with conduction abnormalities and pacemakers should be further defined.</description>
<date>2021-08-24</date>
<date>2021-08-24</date>
<date>2020-05</date>
<type>review article</type>
<identifier>Birnbaum Yochai, Fiol Miguel, Nikus Kjell, Garcia Niebla Javier, Bacharova Ljuba, Dubner Sergio, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 May;60:142-147. Epub 2020 Apr 18.</identifier>
<identifier>0022-0736</identifier>
<identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776</identifier>
<identifier>10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</identifier>
<identifier>1532-8430</identifier>
<identifier>32361523</identifier>
<identifier>L2005716873</identifier>
<identifier>2-s2.0-85083892583</identifier>
<identifier>000543005800028</identifier>
<language>eng</language>
<relation>https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</relation>
<rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</rights>
<publisher>Churchill Livingstone Inc Medical Publishers</publisher>
</thesis>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<record schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="042">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Birnbaum, Yochai</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Fiol Sala, Miquel</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Nikus, Kjell</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Garcia Niebla, Javier</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Bacharova, Ljuba</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Dubner, Sergio</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Zareba, Wojciech</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Macfarlane, Peter W.</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Cygankiewicz, Iwona</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Bayes de Luna, Antoni</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="260">
<subfield code="c">2020-05</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="520">
<subfield code="a">The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (FUDMI) [published simultaneously in 2018 in numerous journals including Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal] focuses mainly on the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI), along with the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, in order to define the etiology of myocardial injury. As a consequence, there is less emphasis on updating the parts of the definition concerning the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes related to MI. Evidence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MI and the ECG is the main available tool for i) detecting acute ischemia, ii) triage and iii) risk stratification upon presentation. This review focuses on multiple aspects of ECG interpretation that we firmly believe should be considered for incorporation in any future update to the Universal Definition of MI. Our counterpoint view is that: a) the use of the ECG following coronary artery bypass surgery should be better explored and defined; b) the emphasis in the FUDMI on convex versus concave ST-elevation, which is questionable, should be balanced by the fact that many patients with true ST-elevation MI (STEMI) present with a concave form of ST elevation; c) reciprocal ST-depression in STEMI caused by right coronary artery or left circumflex artery occlusion, should be set against the fact that not all anterior STEMIs present with reciprocal ST-depression which can also be seen in cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy; d) the posterior leads V7-V9 should be placed on a horizontal line from V4, rather than follow the 5th intercostal space; e) ST-depression in V1-V3 is not a manifestation of ischemia of the basal inferior segment, placed horizontally; f) Interpreting ST-T changes in patients with conduction abnormalities and pacemakers should be further defined.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">Birnbaum Yochai, Fiol Miguel, Nikus Kjell, Garcia Niebla Javier, Bacharova Ljuba, Dubner Sergio, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 May;60:142-147. Epub 2020 Apr 18.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">0022-0736</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">1532-8430</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">32361523</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">L2005716873</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">2-s2.0-85083892583</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">000543005800028</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="0" ind2="0" tag="245">
<subfield code="a">A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<mets ID=" DSpace_ITEM_20.500.13003-10776" OBJID=" hdl:20.500.13003/10776" PROFILE="DSpace METS SIP Profile 1.0" TYPE="DSpace ITEM" schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd">
<metsHdr CREATEDATE="2024-09-29T04:21:03Z">
<agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION">
<name>Docusalut</name>
</agent>
</metsHdr>
<dmdSec ID="DMD_20.500.13003_10776">
<mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS">
<xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:mods schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Birnbaum, Yochai</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Fiol Sala, Miquel</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Nikus, Kjell</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Garcia Niebla, Javier</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Bacharova, Ljuba</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Dubner, Sergio</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Zareba, Wojciech</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Macfarlane, Peter W.</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Cygankiewicz, Iwona</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Bayes de Luna, Antoni</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
</mods:extension>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</mods:dateAvailable>
</mods:extension>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2020-05</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:identifier type="citation">Birnbaum Yochai, Fiol Miguel, Nikus Kjell, Garcia Niebla Javier, Bacharova Ljuba, Dubner Sergio, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 May;60:142-147. Epub 2020 Apr 18.</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="issn">0022-0736</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="essn">1532-8430</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="pmid">32361523</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="pui">L2005716873</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="scopus">2-s2.0-85083892583</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="wos">000543005800028</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (FUDMI) [published simultaneously in 2018 in numerous journals including Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal] focuses mainly on the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI), along with the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, in order to define the etiology of myocardial injury. As a consequence, there is less emphasis on updating the parts of the definition concerning the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes related to MI. Evidence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MI and the ECG is the main available tool for i) detecting acute ischemia, ii) triage and iii) risk stratification upon presentation. This review focuses on multiple aspects of ECG interpretation that we firmly believe should be considered for incorporation in any future update to the Universal Definition of MI. Our counterpoint view is that: a) the use of the ECG following coronary artery bypass surgery should be better explored and defined; b) the emphasis in the FUDMI on convex versus concave ST-elevation, which is questionable, should be balanced by the fact that many patients with true ST-elevation MI (STEMI) present with a concave form of ST elevation; c) reciprocal ST-depression in STEMI caused by right coronary artery or left circumflex artery occlusion, should be set against the fact that not all anterior STEMIs present with reciprocal ST-depression which can also be seen in cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy; d) the posterior leads V7-V9 should be placed on a horizontal line from V4, rather than follow the 5th intercostal space; e) ST-depression in V1-V3 is not a manifestation of ischemia of the basal inferior segment, placed horizontally; f) Interpreting ST-T changes in patients with conduction abnormalities and pacemakers should be further defined.</mods:abstract>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm authority="rfc3066">eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>review article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>
</xmlData>
</mdWrap>
</dmdSec>
<amdSec ID="FO_20.500.13003_10776_1">
<techMD ID="TECH_O_20.500.13003_10776_1">
<mdWrap MDTYPE="PREMIS">
<xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/PREMIS-v1-0.xsd">
<premis:premis>
<premis:object>
<premis:objectIdentifier>
<premis:objectIdentifierType>URL</premis:objectIdentifierType>
<premis:objectIdentifierValue>https://docusalut.com/bitstream/20.500.13003/10776/1/j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf</premis:objectIdentifierValue>
</premis:objectIdentifier>
<premis:objectCategory>File</premis:objectCategory>
<premis:objectCharacteristics>
<premis:fixity>
<premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>MD5</premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>
<premis:messageDigest>786f31b9747be6fd743976d81ab835ef</premis:messageDigest>
</premis:fixity>
<premis:size>561475</premis:size>
<premis:format>
<premis:formatDesignation>
<premis:formatName>application/pdf</premis:formatName>
</premis:formatDesignation>
</premis:format>
</premis:objectCharacteristics>
<premis:originalName>j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf</premis:originalName>
</premis:object>
</premis:premis>
</xmlData>
</mdWrap>
</techMD>
</amdSec>
<amdSec ID="FT_20.500.13003_10776_2">
<techMD ID="TECH_T_20.500.13003_10776_2">
<mdWrap MDTYPE="PREMIS">
<xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/PREMIS-v1-0.xsd">
<premis:premis>
<premis:object>
<premis:objectIdentifier>
<premis:objectIdentifierType>URL</premis:objectIdentifierType>
<premis:objectIdentifierValue>https://docusalut.com/bitstream/20.500.13003/10776/2/j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf.txt</premis:objectIdentifierValue>
</premis:objectIdentifier>
<premis:objectCategory>File</premis:objectCategory>
<premis:objectCharacteristics>
<premis:fixity>
<premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>MD5</premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>
<premis:messageDigest>ad2aaad51a467d358ca07b20da55177b</premis:messageDigest>
</premis:fixity>
<premis:size>35873</premis:size>
<premis:format>
<premis:formatDesignation>
<premis:formatName>text/plain</premis:formatName>
</premis:formatDesignation>
</premis:format>
</premis:objectCharacteristics>
<premis:originalName>j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf.txt</premis:originalName>
</premis:object>
</premis:premis>
</xmlData>
</mdWrap>
</techMD>
</amdSec>
<fileSec>
<fileGrp USE="ORIGINAL">
<file ADMID="FO_20.500.13003_10776_1" CHECKSUM="786f31b9747be6fd743976d81ab835ef" CHECKSUMTYPE="MD5" GROUPID="GROUP_BITSTREAM_20.500.13003_10776_1" ID="BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_20.500.13003_10776_1" MIMETYPE="application/pdf" SEQ="1" SIZE="561475">
</file>
</fileGrp>
<fileGrp USE="TEXT">
<file ADMID="FT_20.500.13003_10776_2" CHECKSUM="ad2aaad51a467d358ca07b20da55177b" CHECKSUMTYPE="MD5" GROUPID="GROUP_BITSTREAM_20.500.13003_10776_2" ID="BITSTREAM_TEXT_20.500.13003_10776_2" MIMETYPE="text/plain" SEQ="2" SIZE="35873">
</file>
</fileGrp>
</fileSec>
<structMap LABEL="DSpace Object" TYPE="LOGICAL">
<div ADMID="DMD_20.500.13003_10776" TYPE="DSpace Object Contents">
<div TYPE="DSpace BITSTREAM">
</div>
</div>
</structMap>
</mets>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<mods:mods schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Birnbaum, Yochai</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Fiol Sala, Miquel</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Nikus, Kjell</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Garcia Niebla, Javier</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Bacharova, Ljuba</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Dubner, Sergio</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Zareba, Wojciech</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Macfarlane, Peter W.</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Cygankiewicz, Iwona</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Bayes de Luna, Antoni</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</mods:dateAvailable>
</mods:extension>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
</mods:extension>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2020-05</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:identifier type="citation">Birnbaum Yochai, Fiol Miguel, Nikus Kjell, Garcia Niebla Javier, Bacharova Ljuba, Dubner Sergio, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 May;60:142-147. Epub 2020 Apr 18.</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="issn">0022-0736</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="essn">1532-8430</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="pmid">32361523</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="pui">L2005716873</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="scopus">2-s2.0-85083892583</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="wos">000543005800028</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (FUDMI) [published simultaneously in 2018 in numerous journals including Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal] focuses mainly on the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI), along with the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, in order to define the etiology of myocardial injury. As a consequence, there is less emphasis on updating the parts of the definition concerning the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes related to MI. Evidence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MI and the ECG is the main available tool for i) detecting acute ischemia, ii) triage and iii) risk stratification upon presentation. This review focuses on multiple aspects of ECG interpretation that we firmly believe should be considered for incorporation in any future update to the Universal Definition of MI. Our counterpoint view is that: a) the use of the ECG following coronary artery bypass surgery should be better explored and defined; b) the emphasis in the FUDMI on convex versus concave ST-elevation, which is questionable, should be balanced by the fact that many patients with true ST-elevation MI (STEMI) present with a concave form of ST elevation; c) reciprocal ST-depression in STEMI caused by right coronary artery or left circumflex artery occlusion, should be set against the fact that not all anterior STEMIs present with reciprocal ST-depression which can also be seen in cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy; d) the posterior leads V7-V9 should be placed on a horizontal line from V4, rather than follow the 5th intercostal space; e) ST-depression in V1-V3 is not a manifestation of ischemia of the basal inferior segment, placed horizontally; f) Interpreting ST-T changes in patients with conduction abnormalities and pacemakers should be further defined.</mods:abstract>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>review article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<atom:entry schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom http://www.kbcafe.com/rss/atom.xsd.xml">
<atom:id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776/ore.xml</atom:id>
<atom:published>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</atom:published>
<atom:updated>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</atom:updated>
<atom:source>
<atom:generator>Docusalut</atom:generator>
</atom:source>
<atom:title>A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</atom:title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Birnbaum, Yochai</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Fiol Sala, Miquel</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Nikus, Kjell</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Garcia Niebla, Javier</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Bacharova, Ljuba</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Dubner, Sergio</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Zareba, Wojciech</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Macfarlane, Peter W.</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Cygankiewicz, Iwona</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Bayes de Luna, Antoni</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<oreatom:triples>
<rdf:Description about="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776/ore.xml#atom">
<dcterms:modified>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dcterms:modified>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="https://docusalut.com/bitstream/20.500.13003/10776/1/j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf">
<dcterms:description>ORIGINAL</dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="https://docusalut.com/bitstream/20.500.13003/10776/2/j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf.txt">
<dcterms:description>TEXT</dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="https://docusalut.com/bitstream/20.500.13003/10776/3/j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf.jpg">
<dcterms:description>THUMBNAIL</dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description>
</oreatom:triples>
</atom:entry>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<qdc:qualifieddc schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
<dc:title>A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Birnbaum, Yochai</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Fiol Sala, Miquel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Nikus, Kjell</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Garcia Niebla, Javier</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bacharova, Ljuba</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Dubner, Sergio</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Zareba, Wojciech</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Macfarlane, Peter W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Cygankiewicz, Iwona</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bayes de Luna, Antoni</dc:creator>
<dcterms:abstract>The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (FUDMI) [published simultaneously in 2018 in numerous journals including Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal] focuses mainly on the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI), along with the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, in order to define the etiology of myocardial injury. As a consequence, there is less emphasis on updating the parts of the definition concerning the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes related to MI. Evidence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MI and the ECG is the main available tool for i) detecting acute ischemia, ii) triage and iii) risk stratification upon presentation. This review focuses on multiple aspects of ECG interpretation that we firmly believe should be considered for incorporation in any future update to the Universal Definition of MI. Our counterpoint view is that: a) the use of the ECG following coronary artery bypass surgery should be better explored and defined; b) the emphasis in the FUDMI on convex versus concave ST-elevation, which is questionable, should be balanced by the fact that many patients with true ST-elevation MI (STEMI) present with a concave form of ST elevation; c) reciprocal ST-depression in STEMI caused by right coronary artery or left circumflex artery occlusion, should be set against the fact that not all anterior STEMIs present with reciprocal ST-depression which can also be seen in cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy; d) the posterior leads V7-V9 should be placed on a horizontal line from V4, rather than follow the 5th intercostal space; e) ST-depression in V1-V3 is not a manifestation of ischemia of the basal inferior segment, placed horizontally; f) Interpreting ST-T changes in patients with conduction abnormalities and pacemakers should be further defined.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:dateAccepted>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dcterms:dateAccepted>
<dcterms:available>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:created>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dcterms:created>
<dcterms:issued>2020-05</dcterms:issued>
<dc:type>review article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Birnbaum Yochai, Fiol Miguel, Nikus Kjell, Garcia Niebla Javier, Bacharova Ljuba, Dubner Sergio, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 May;60:142-147. Epub 2020 Apr 18.</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0022-0736</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>1532-8430</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>32361523</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>L2005716873</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>2-s2.0-85083892583</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>000543005800028</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Churchill Livingstone Inc Medical Publishers</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
<ow:Publication about="oai:docusalut.com:20.500.13003/10776">
<dc:title>A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Birnbaum, Yochai</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Fiol Sala, Miquel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Nikus, Kjell</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Garcia Niebla, Javier</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bacharova, Ljuba</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Dubner, Sergio</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Zareba, Wojciech</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Macfarlane, Peter W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Cygankiewicz, Iwona</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bayes de Luna, Antoni</dc:creator>
<dc:description>The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (FUDMI) [published simultaneously in 2018 in numerous journals including Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal] focuses mainly on the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI), along with the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, in order to define the etiology of myocardial injury. As a consequence, there is less emphasis on updating the parts of the definition concerning the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes related to MI. Evidence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MI and the ECG is the main available tool for i) detecting acute ischemia, ii) triage and iii) risk stratification upon presentation. This review focuses on multiple aspects of ECG interpretation that we firmly believe should be considered for incorporation in any future update to the Universal Definition of MI. Our counterpoint view is that: a) the use of the ECG following coronary artery bypass surgery should be better explored and defined; b) the emphasis in the FUDMI on convex versus concave ST-elevation, which is questionable, should be balanced by the fact that many patients with true ST-elevation MI (STEMI) present with a concave form of ST elevation; c) reciprocal ST-depression in STEMI caused by right coronary artery or left circumflex artery occlusion, should be set against the fact that not all anterior STEMIs present with reciprocal ST-depression which can also be seen in cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy; d) the posterior leads V7-V9 should be placed on a horizontal line from V4, rather than follow the 5th intercostal space; e) ST-depression in V1-V3 is not a manifestation of ischemia of the basal inferior segment, placed horizontally; f) Interpreting ST-T changes in patients with conduction abnormalities and pacemakers should be further defined.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2020-05</dc:date>
<dc:type>review article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Birnbaum Yochai, Fiol Miguel, Nikus Kjell, Garcia Niebla Javier, Bacharova Ljuba, Dubner Sergio, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 May;60:142-147. Epub 2020 Apr 18.</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0022-0736</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>1532-8430</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>32361523</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>L2005716873</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>2-s2.0-85083892583</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>000543005800028</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Churchill Livingstone Inc Medical Publishers</dc:publisher>
</ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<metadata schemaLocation="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai http://www.lyncode.com/xsd/xoai.xsd">
<element name="dc">
<element name="contributor">
<element name="author">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Birnbaum, Yochai</field>
<field name="authority">a51c6d2e-cd7d-4577-a36f-cbf5887c4c60</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
<field name="value">Fiol Sala, Miquel</field>
<field name="authority">241</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
<field name="orcid_id">0000-0002-5370-1391</field>
<field name="value">Nikus, Kjell</field>
<field name="authority">ab240269-010f-414a-baba-346b8f4f7d57</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
<field name="value">Garcia Niebla, Javier</field>
<field name="authority">31c03ab7-1c86-4b0c-b0ba-ea7ff3df521f</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
<field name="value">Bacharova, Ljuba</field>
<field name="authority">aeb44617-21cd-4695-bae0-622da45a8b5b</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
<field name="value">Dubner, Sergio</field>
<field name="authority">151b255e-f3ca-4156-8f42-c3b40338efee</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
<field name="value">Zareba, Wojciech</field>
<field name="authority">378058c7-0b38-4693-85ea-23fdeb82ca9d</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
<field name="value">Macfarlane, Peter W.</field>
<field name="authority">be949326-a881-4943-932d-0aef66b0780d</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
<field name="value">Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz</field>
<field name="authority">b37127a8-b355-4bb3-be5f-fe1e76a59a54</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
<field name="value">Cygankiewicz, Iwona</field>
<field name="authority">5e64fef1-06fd-47ea-98ad-c06cb6eb05d8</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
<field name="value">Bayes de Luna, Antoni</field>
<field name="authority">5964904b-271e-421c-ae63-5531e9e16d42</field>
<field name="confidence">500</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="date">
<element name="accessioned">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="available">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">2021-08-24T16:02:56Z</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="issued">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">2020-05</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="embargoEndDate">
</element>
</element>
<element name="identifier">
<element name="citation">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">Birnbaum Yochai, Fiol Miguel, Nikus Kjell, Garcia Niebla Javier, Bacharova Ljuba, Dubner Sergio, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 May;60:142-147. Epub 2020 Apr 18.</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="issn">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">0022-0736</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="uri">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10776</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="doi">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="essn">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">1532-8430</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="pmid">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">32361523</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="pui">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">L2005716873</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="scopus">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">2-s2.0-85083892583</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="wos">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">000543005800028</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="description">
<element name="abstract">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (FUDMI) [published simultaneously in 2018 in numerous journals including Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal] focuses mainly on the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury and myocardial infarction (MI), along with the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, in order to define the etiology of myocardial injury. As a consequence, there is less emphasis on updating the parts of the definition concerning the electrocardiographic (ECG) changes related to MI. Evidence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MI and the ECG is the main available tool for i) detecting acute ischemia, ii) triage and iii) risk stratification upon presentation. This review focuses on multiple aspects of ECG interpretation that we firmly believe should be considered for incorporation in any future update to the Universal Definition of MI. Our counterpoint view is that: a) the use of the ECG following coronary artery bypass surgery should be better explored and defined; b) the emphasis in the FUDMI on convex versus concave ST-elevation, which is questionable, should be balanced by the fact that many patients with true ST-elevation MI (STEMI) present with a concave form of ST elevation; c) reciprocal ST-depression in STEMI caused by right coronary artery or left circumflex artery occlusion, should be set against the fact that not all anterior STEMIs present with reciprocal ST-depression which can also be seen in cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrophy; d) the posterior leads V7-V9 should be placed on a horizontal line from V4, rather than follow the 5th intercostal space; e) ST-depression in V1-V3 is not a manifestation of ischemia of the basal inferior segment, placed horizontally; f) Interpreting ST-T changes in patients with conduction abnormalities and pacemakers should be further defined.</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="language">
<element name="iso">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">eng</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="publisher">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">Churchill Livingstone Inc Medical Publishers</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="rights">
<element name="uri">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="title">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="type">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">review article</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="journal">
<element name="title">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">Journal of Electrocardiology</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="page">
<element name="initial">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">142</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="final">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">147</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="relation">
<element name="publisherversion">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.012</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="volume">
<element name="number">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">60</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="bundles">
<element name="bundle">
<field name="name">ORIGINAL</field>
<element name="bitstreams">
<element name="bitstream">
<field name="name">j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf</field>
<field name="originalName">j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf</field>
<field name="format">application/pdf</field>
<field name="size">561475</field>
<field name="url">https://docusalut.com/bitstream/20.500.13003/10776/1/j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf</field>
<field name="checksum">786f31b9747be6fd743976d81ab835ef</field>
<field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
<field name="sid">1</field>
<field name="drm">open access</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="bundle">
<field name="name">TEXT</field>
<element name="bitstreams">
<element name="bitstream">
<field name="name">j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf.txt</field>
<field name="originalName">j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf.txt</field>
<field name="description">Extracted text</field>
<field name="format">text/plain</field>
<field name="size">35873</field>
<field name="url">https://docusalut.com/bitstream/20.500.13003/10776/2/j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf.txt</field>
<field name="checksum">ad2aaad51a467d358ca07b20da55177b</field>
<field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
<field name="sid">2</field>
<field name="drm">open access</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="bundle">
<field name="name">THUMBNAIL</field>
<element name="bitstreams">
<element name="bitstream">
<field name="name">j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf.jpg</field>
<field name="originalName">j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf.jpg</field>
<field name="description">IM Thumbnail</field>
<field name="format">image/jpeg</field>
<field name="size">5444</field>
<field name="url">https://docusalut.com/bitstream/20.500.13003/10776/3/j_electrocardiol_2020-60-142.pdf.jpg</field>
<field name="checksum">1f30011a9964c9d840df58a439ccd18f</field>
<field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
<field name="sid">3</field>
<field name="drm">open access</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="others">
<field name="handle">20.500.13003/10776</field>
<field name="identifier">oai:docusalut.com:20.500.13003/10776</field>
<field name="lastModifyDate">2024-09-11 12:03:23.559</field>
<field name="drm">open access</field>
</element>
<element name="repository">
<field name="name">Docusalut</field>
<field name="mail">docusalut@bibliosalut.com</field>
</element>
</metadata>