<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Comparación de indicadores de producción lechera en Cerdas Creole y large white en un medio tropical húmedo: primeros resultados</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Gourdine, J.L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Renaudeau, D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Anaïs, C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Benony, K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bocage, B.</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Local breed</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Swine</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lactation</dc:subject>
<dc:description>A total of one hundred and twenty seven lactations were used to study the effect of genotype (Creole vs Large White) on lactating performance. This experiment was conducted in Guadeloupe (F.W.I., 16° Lat. N., 61° Long. W) between June 2001 and April 2003. Over a 28-d lactation length, average daily feed intake was significantly lower (p<0.01) in Creole (CR) than in Large White (LW) sows when it was expressed in kilograms or in grams per kilogram of metabolic body weight (3.1 vs 4.3 kg/d and 73 vs 80 g/d/ kg0.75). After farrowing, first parity CR sows were 26 kg lighter compared to primiparous LW sows. This difference was accentuated in multiparous sows (i.e., -95 kg). On average, body weight (BW) loss during lactation was not affected by the genotype. However, the backfat thickness loss was significantly higher (p<0.001) in CR than in LW sows (16 vs 30 mm). Litter size at birth and at weaning were significantly reduced (p<0.01) in CR than in LW sows (8.7 vs 10.3 and 7.7 vs 9.1, respectively). The piglet BW gain and mean BW at weaning were significantly lower (p< 0.01) in CR compared to LW sows (190 vs 208 g/d, and 6.35 vs 7.06 kg respectively). Daily feed intake pattern during lactation differed between LW and CR sows. CR daily feed intake increased constantly whereas LW daily consumption increased rapidly during the 1st wk and remained around 4.8 kg over the last 3 wk of lactation. In conclusion, LW sows have better lactating performance than CR sows.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Universidad de Córdoba: Servicio de Publicaciones</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2005</dc:date>
<dc:type>text (article)</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=1429361</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>(Revista) ISSN 0004-0592</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Archivos de zootecnia, ISSN 0004-0592, Vol. 54, Nº 206-207, 2005, pags. 423-428</dc:source>
<dc:language>spa</dc:language>
<dc:rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>