<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>A Critical Assessment of the US National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Missed Opportunity?</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Smith, Paul</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>POLITICA DE DEFENSA.</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>TERRORISMO.</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ESTADOS UNIDOS</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>PLANIFICACION ESTRATEGICA</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>INTEGRISMO</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Neither the new 2011 US National Strategy for Counterterrorism, nor the recently published counter-radicalisation strategy provide a template upon which Federal, State and local law enforcement and civilian agencies could effectively plan the future US defence against terrorism. Has an opportunity been lost? The White House recently published two significant strategies outlining its approach to the threat of domestic terrorism from Islamic violent extremism. The National Strategy for Counterterrorism is a wide-ranging review of the challenges that currently face the US in its decade-long campaign against al-Qaeda. It is upbeat in tone after the death of Osama Bin Laden. However, the detailed descriptions of the nine theatres of counterterrorist operations across the world in which America is engaged are less optimistic. Critically, for the first time in a National Counterterrorism Strategy document, one of those theatres considered is the US Homeland itself. Faced with this new threat, America urgently requires a national domestic counterterrorism doctrine which can effectively unite the global reach of its counterterrorist intelligence community with the detailed domain awareness of its law-enforcement agencies. In addition, the White House also recently published a counter-radicalisation strategy, titled ‘Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States’. However, this fails to offer much practical advice to the government’s State and local partners. Consequently, America still needs a comprehensive inter-agency counter-radicalisation policy to address al-Qaeda’s effective efforts ‘on line’ to recruit American Muslim youths to their cause.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Real Instituto Elcano</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2011-09-27</dc:date>
<dc:type>Artículo</dc:type>
<dc:type>PeerReviewed</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>http://ribei.org/2176/1/ARI-128-2011-I.pdf</dc:identifier>
<dc:relation>http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_eng/NewsletterView?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/elcano/elcano_in/newsletter/newsletter+81</dc:relation>
<dc:identifier>Smith, Paul (2011) A Critical Assessment of the US National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Missed Opportunity? Elcano Newsletter (80). 8 p.. ISSN 1698-5184</dc:identifier>
<dc:relation>http://ribei.org/2176/</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<didl:DIDL DIDLDocumentId="http://ribei.org/id/eprint/2176" schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2005:01-DIP-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dip/dip.xsd">
<didl:Item>
<didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
<dii:Identifier>http://ribei.org/id/eprint/2176</dii:Identifier>
</didl:Statement>
</didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
<dcterms:modified>2012-04-15T02:49:55Z</dcterms:modified>
</didl:Statement>
</didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Component>
</didl:Component>
<didl:Item>
<didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
<dip:ObjectType>info:eu-repo/semantics/descriptiveMetadata</dip:ObjectType>
</didl:Statement>
</didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Component>
<didl:Resource mimeType="application/xml">
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>A Critical Assessment of the US National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Missed Opportunity?</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Smith, Paul</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>POLITICA DE DEFENSA.</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>TERRORISMO.</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ESTADOS UNIDOS</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>PLANIFICACION ESTRATEGICA</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>INTEGRISMO</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Neither the new 2011 US National Strategy for Counterterrorism, nor the recently published counter-radicalisation strategy provide a template upon which Federal, State and local law enforcement and civilian agencies could effectively plan the future US defence against terrorism. Has an opportunity been lost? The White House recently published two significant strategies outlining its approach to the threat of domestic terrorism from Islamic violent extremism. The National Strategy for Counterterrorism is a wide-ranging review of the challenges that currently face the US in its decade-long campaign against al-Qaeda. It is upbeat in tone after the death of Osama Bin Laden. However, the detailed descriptions of the nine theatres of counterterrorist operations across the world in which America is engaged are less optimistic. Critically, for the first time in a National Counterterrorism Strategy document, one of those theatres considered is the US Homeland itself. Faced with this new threat, America urgently requires a national domestic counterterrorism doctrine which can effectively unite the global reach of its counterterrorist intelligence community with the detailed domain awareness of its law-enforcement agencies. In addition, the White House also recently published a counter-radicalisation strategy, titled ‘Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States’. However, this fails to offer much practical advice to the government’s State and local partners. Consequently, America still needs a comprehensive inter-agency counter-radicalisation policy to address al-Qaeda’s effective efforts ‘on line’ to recruit American Muslim youths to their cause.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Real Instituto Elcano</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2011-09-27</dc:date>
<dc:type>Artículo</dc:type>
<dc:type>PeerReviewed</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>http://ribei.org/2176/1/ARI-128-2011-I.pdf</dc:identifier>
<dc:relation>http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_eng/NewsletterView?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/elcano/elcano_in/newsletter/newsletter+81</dc:relation>
<dc:identifier>Smith, Paul (2011) A Critical Assessment of the US National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Missed Opportunity? Elcano Newsletter (80). 8 p.. ISSN 1698-5184</dc:identifier>
<dc:relation>http://ribei.org/2176/</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>
</didl:Resource>
</didl:Component>
</didl:Item>
<didl:Item>
<didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
<dip:ObjectType>info:eu-repo/semantics/objectFile</dip:ObjectType>
</didl:Statement>
</didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Component>
</didl:Component>
</didl:Item>
<didl:Item>
<didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml">
<dip:ObjectType>info:eu-repo/semantics/humanStartPage</dip:ObjectType>
</didl:Statement>
</didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Component>
</didl:Component>
</didl:Item>
</didl:Item>
</didl:DIDL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<mets:mets LABEL="Eprints Item" OBJID="eprint_2176" schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mets:metsHdr CREATEDATE="2013-01-12T03:44:58Z">
<mets:agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION">
<mets:name>Repositorio Digital RIBEI</mets:name>
</mets:agent>
</mets:metsHdr>
<mets:dmdSec ID="DMD_eprint_2176_mods">
<mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS">
<mets:xmlData>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>A Critical Assessment of the US National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Missed Opportunity?</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:name type="personal">
<mods:namePart type="given">Paul</mods:namePart>
<mods:namePart type="family">Smith</mods:namePart>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
</mods:name>
<mods:abstract>Neither the new 2011 US National Strategy for Counterterrorism, nor the recently published counter-radicalisation strategy provide a template upon which Federal, State and local law enforcement and civilian agencies could effectively plan the future US defence against terrorism. Has an opportunity been lost? The White House recently published two significant strategies outlining its approach to the threat of domestic terrorism from Islamic violent extremism. The National Strategy for Counterterrorism is a wide-ranging review of the challenges that currently face the US in its decade-long campaign against al-Qaeda. It is upbeat in tone after the death of Osama Bin Laden. However, the detailed descriptions of the nine theatres of counterterrorist operations across the world in which America is engaged are less optimistic. Critically, for the first time in a National Counterterrorism Strategy document, one of those theatres considered is the US Homeland itself. Faced with this new threat, America urgently requires a national domestic counterterrorism doctrine which can effectively unite the global reach of its counterterrorist intelligence community with the detailed domain awareness of its law-enforcement agencies. In addition, the White House also recently published a counter-radicalisation strategy, titled ‘Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States’. However, this fails to offer much practical advice to the government’s State and local partners. Consequently, America still needs a comprehensive inter-agency counter-radicalisation policy to address al-Qaeda’s effective efforts ‘on line’ to recruit American Muslim youths to their cause.</mods:abstract>
<mods:classification authority="lcc">POLITICA DE DEFENSA.</mods:classification>
<mods:classification authority="lcc">TERRORISMO.</mods:classification>
<mods:classification authority="lcc">ESTADOS UNIDOS</mods:classification>
<mods:classification authority="lcc">PLANIFICACION ESTRATEGICA</mods:classification>
<mods:classification authority="lcc">INTEGRISMO</mods:classification>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2011-09-27</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:publisher>Real Instituto Elcano</mods:publisher>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:genre>Artículo</mods:genre>
</mets:xmlData>
</mets:mdWrap>
</mets:dmdSec>
<mets:amdSec ID="TMD_eprint_2176">
<mets:rightsMD ID="rights_eprint_2176_mods">
<mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS">
<mets:xmlData>
<mods:useAndReproduction>
<p>
<strong>Para trabajos depositados por el propio autor:</strong>
</p>
<p>
<strong>Para trabajos depositados por otras personas que no sean el autor:</strong>
</p>
<p>Pulsar en el botón de Depositar Ahora, que indica la aceptación de estos términos.</p>
</mods:useAndReproduction>
</mets:xmlData>
</mets:mdWrap>
</mets:rightsMD>
</mets:amdSec>
<mets:fileSec>
<mets:fileGrp USE="reference">
<mets:file ID="eprint_2176_7108_1" MIMETYPE="application/pdf" OWNERID="http://ribei.org/2176/1/ARI-128-2011-I.pdf" SIZE="75420">
</mets:file>
</mets:fileGrp>
</mets:fileSec>
<mets:structMap>
<mets:div ADMID="TMD_eprint_2176" DMDID="DMD_eprint_2176_mods">
</mets:div>
</mets:structMap>
</mets:mets>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF>
<rdf:Description about="">
<rdfs:comment datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.</rdfs:comment>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/2176/1/ARI-128-2011-I.pdf">
<rdfs:label datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">ARI-128-2011-I.pdf</rdfs:label>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/2176/2/preview.jpg">
<rdfs:label datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">preview.jpg</rdfs:label>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/2176/3/indexcodes.txt">
<rdfs:label datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">indexcodes.txt</rdfs:label>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/2176/">
<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
<dc:title>HTML Summary of #2176 A Critical Assessment of the US National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Missed Opportunity?</dc:title>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/document/7108">
<rdfs:label datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">A Critical Assessment of the US National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Missed Opportunity? (PDF)</rdfs:label>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/document/7109">
<rdfs:label datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">A Critical Assessment of the US National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Missed Opportunity? (Imagen (JPEG))</rdfs:label>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/document/7110">
<rdfs:label datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">A Critical Assessment of the US National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Missed Opportunity? (Indizador de Términos)</rdfs:label>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/eprint/2176#authors">
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/eprint/2176">
<bibo:abstract datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Neither the new 2011 US National Strategy for Counterterrorism, nor the recently published counter-radicalisation strategy provide a template upon which Federal, State and local law enforcement and civilian agencies could effectively plan the future US defence against terrorism. Has an opportunity been lost? The White House recently published two significant strategies outlining its approach to the threat of domestic terrorism from Islamic violent extremism. The National Strategy for Counterterrorism is a wide-ranging review of the challenges that currently face the US in its decade-long campaign against al-Qaeda. It is upbeat in tone after the death of Osama Bin Laden. However, the detailed descriptions of the nine theatres of counterterrorist operations across the world in which America is engaged are less optimistic. Critically, for the first time in a National Counterterrorism Strategy document, one of those theatres considered is the US Homeland itself. Faced with this new threat, America urgently requires a national domestic counterterrorism doctrine which can effectively unite the global reach of its counterterrorist intelligence community with the detailed domain awareness of its law-enforcement agencies. In addition, the White House also recently published a counter-radicalisation strategy, titled ‘Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States’. However, this fails to offer much practical advice to the government’s State and local partners. Consequently, America still needs a comprehensive inter-agency counter-radicalisation policy to address al-Qaeda’s effective efforts ‘on line’ to recruit American Muslim youths to their cause.</bibo:abstract>
<bibo:issue>80</bibo:issue>
<dct:date>2011-09-27</dct:date>
<dct:title datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">A Critical Assessment of the US National Strategy for Counterterrorism: A Missed Opportunity?</dct:title>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/subject/1.2.71">
<skos:prefLabel lang="en">DEFENCE POLICY.</skos:prefLabel>
<skos:prefLabel lang="es">POLITICA DE DEFENSA.</skos:prefLabel>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/subject/1.2.89">
<skos:prefLabel lang="en">TERRORISM.</skos:prefLabel>
<skos:prefLabel lang="es">TERRORISMO.</skos:prefLabel>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/subject/1.4.82">
<skos:prefLabel lang="es">ESTADOS UNIDOS</skos:prefLabel>
<skos:prefLabel lang="en">UNITED STATES</skos:prefLabel>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/subject/2.1.26">
<skos:prefLabel lang="es">PLANIFICACION ESTRATEGICA</skos:prefLabel>
<skos:prefLabel lang="en">STRATEGIC PLANNING</skos:prefLabel>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/subject/5.4.22">
<skos:prefLabel lang="en">FUNDAMENTALISM</skos:prefLabel>
<skos:prefLabel lang="es">INTEGRISMO</skos:prefLabel>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/org/ext-6d75a30930231a10b9804bb9af866045">
<foaf:name datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Real Instituto Elcano</foaf:name>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/person/ext-565518129e7aa32583c71300d34943c8">
<foaf:familyName datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Smith</foaf:familyName>
<foaf:givenName datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Paul</foaf:givenName>
<foaf:name datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Paul Smith</foaf:name>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://ribei.org/id/publication/ext-16985184">
<bibo:issn>16985184</bibo:issn>
<foaf:name datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Elcano Newsletter</foaf:name>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>