<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Are (official) ethical approaches to nanotechnology affected by cultural context and tradition? A comparative analysis: Europe-USA</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Borrós Gómez, Salvador</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ruiz Trujillo, Pere</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Florensa, Albert</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>nanoscience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>nanotechnology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>consequentialism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cost-benefit analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cultural context</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>deontology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>precautionary principle</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Lately, nanotechnology has become one of the main topics in the debates regarding what has been called the Next Industrial Revolution within what are known as emergent technologies. This paper contains a comparative analysis of the different philosophical groundings, arguments and principles invoked in the official ethical approaches proposed by each of two of the main Western communities. By official ethical approaches or official positions we mean the opinions officially expressed by the government institutions about how ethical considerations prompted by nanotechnologies should be tackled. The analysis is based, then, on the official points of view, expressed through two documents, namely two official releases issued by governmental offices or institutions in both communities, Europe and the United States of America, and considered by the authors as representative of the official opinions of the governmental institutions in each society.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Universitat Ramon Llull</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2011</dc:date>
<dc:type>text (article)</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3708351</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>(Revista) ISSN 2013-8393</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Ramon Llull journal of applied ethics, ISSN 2013-8393, Nº. 2, 2011, pags. 195-212</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>