<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Arribas, Sonia</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Hamlet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Freud</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benjamin</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lacan</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Schmitt</dc:subject>
<dc:description>A great part of Hamlet’s mystery resides in the Mousetrap. Its role is fundamental for the tension of the play, yet its importance extends beyond that. Philosophers and psychoanalysts alike have been fascinated by it. The former have underlined its epistemological aspects and capacity for self-reflection: its power to mirror reality and reveal something new. The latter have placed weight on its ‘primal scene’ character and have underlined its failure to move Hamlet to act. Here I explore the paradox that results from putting philosophy and psychoanalysis together. To illustrate its functions, as well as the different readings of it, I delve into certain moments of the scene and Hamlet several times. Expanding on some remarks made by Lacan about the Mousetrap, I contend that it is a ‘rigging system’, a highly complex mise-en-abyme structure and intersubjective complex unfolded over successive layers. This explains the self-reflectivity discerned by philosophers. Following Benjamin and Lacan, and by means of a detour through Schmitt, I argue at the end that its failure needs to be situated in the historical moment when it was created – a world characterised by the lack of transcendent values – one in which art folds back upon itself infinitely.</dc:description>
<dc:description>This work was supported by MINECO: [grant number FFI2015-70273-P].</dc:description>
<dc:date>2022</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Arribas S. 'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Textual Pract. 2022;36(9):1537-58. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0950-236X</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60947</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Textual Practice. 2022;36(9):1537-58.</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Textual Practice on 01 Sep 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:publisher>Taylor & Francis</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<d:DIDL schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd">
<d:DIDLInfo>
<dcterms:created schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd">2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</dcterms:created>
</d:DIDLInfo>
<d:Item id="hdl_10230_60947">
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<dii:Identifier schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:10230/60947</dii:Identifier>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Descriptor>
<d:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Arribas, Sonia</dc:creator>
<dc:description>A great part of Hamlet’s mystery resides in the Mousetrap. Its role is fundamental for the tension of the play, yet its importance extends beyond that. Philosophers and psychoanalysts alike have been fascinated by it. The former have underlined its epistemological aspects and capacity for self-reflection: its power to mirror reality and reveal something new. The latter have placed weight on its ‘primal scene’ character and have underlined its failure to move Hamlet to act. Here I explore the paradox that results from putting philosophy and psychoanalysis together. To illustrate its functions, as well as the different readings of it, I delve into certain moments of the scene and Hamlet several times. Expanding on some remarks made by Lacan about the Mousetrap, I contend that it is a ‘rigging system’, a highly complex mise-en-abyme structure and intersubjective complex unfolded over successive layers. This explains the self-reflectivity discerned by philosophers. Following Benjamin and Lacan, and by means of a detour through Schmitt, I argue at the end that its failure needs to be situated in the historical moment when it was created – a world characterised by the lack of transcendent values – one in which art folds back upon itself infinitely.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</dc:date>
<dc:date>2022</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Arribas S. 'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Textual Pract. 2022;36(9):1537-58. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0950-236X</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60947</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Textual Practice. 2022;36(9):1537-58.</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Textual Practice on 01 Sep 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Taylor & Francis</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
</d:Statement>
</d:Descriptor>
<d:Component id="10230_60947_1">
</d:Component>
</d:Item>
</d:DIDL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<dim:dim schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
<dim:field element="contributor" mdschema="dc" qualifier="author">Arribas, Sonia</dim:field>
<dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="accessioned">2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</dim:field>
<dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="available">2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</dim:field>
<dim:field element="date" mdschema="dc" qualifier="issued">2022</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="citation">Arribas S. 'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Textual Pract. 2022;36(9):1537-58. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="issn">0950-236X</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60947</dim:field>
<dim:field element="identifier" mdschema="dc" qualifier="doi">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dim:field>
<dim:field element="description" mdschema="dc" qualifier="abstract">A great part of Hamlet’s mystery resides in the Mousetrap. Its role is fundamental for the tension of the play, yet its importance extends beyond that. Philosophers and psychoanalysts alike have been fascinated by it. The former have underlined its epistemological aspects and capacity for self-reflection: its power to mirror reality and reveal something new. The latter have placed weight on its ‘primal scene’ character and have underlined its failure to move Hamlet to act. Here I explore the paradox that results from putting philosophy and psychoanalysis together. To illustrate its functions, as well as the different readings of it, I delve into certain moments of the scene and Hamlet several times. Expanding on some remarks made by Lacan about the Mousetrap, I contend that it is a ‘rigging system’, a highly complex mise-en-abyme structure and intersubjective complex unfolded over successive layers. This explains the self-reflectivity discerned by philosophers. Following Benjamin and Lacan, and by means of a detour through Schmitt, I argue at the end that its failure needs to be situated in the historical moment when it was created – a world characterised by the lack of transcendent values – one in which art folds back upon itself infinitely.</dim:field>
<dim:field element="description" lang="en" mdschema="dc" qualifier="provenance">Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-29T06:54:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Arribas_tex_good.pdf: 259780 bytes, checksum: bed9112ffc4b110fc1fd46ac589702b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022</dim:field>
<dim:field element="description" mdschema="dc" qualifier="sponsorship">This work was supported by MINECO: [grant number FFI2015-70273-P].</dim:field>
<dim:field element="format" mdschema="dc" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
<dim:field element="language" mdschema="dc" qualifier="iso">eng</dim:field>
<dim:field element="publisher" mdschema="dc">Taylor & Francis</dim:field>
<dim:field element="relation" mdschema="dc" qualifier="ispartof">Textual Practice. 2022;36(9):1537-58.</dim:field>
<dim:field element="relation" mdschema="dc" qualifier="projectID">info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</dim:field>
<dim:field element="rights" mdschema="dc">© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Textual Practice on 01 Sep 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dim:field>
<dim:field element="rights" mdschema="dc" qualifier="accessRights">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dim:field>
<dim:field element="title" mdschema="dc">'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</dim:field>
<dim:field element="type" mdschema="dc">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dim:field>
<dim:field element="type" mdschema="dc" qualifier="version">info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</dim:field>
<dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="keyword">Hamlet</dim:field>
<dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="keyword">Freud</dim:field>
<dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="keyword">Benjamin</dim:field>
<dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="keyword">Lacan</dim:field>
<dim:field element="subject" mdschema="dc" qualifier="keyword">Schmitt</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<thesis schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
<title>'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</title>
<creator>Arribas, Sonia</creator>
<description>A great part of Hamlet’s mystery resides in the Mousetrap. Its role is fundamental for the tension of the play, yet its importance extends beyond that. Philosophers and psychoanalysts alike have been fascinated by it. The former have underlined its epistemological aspects and capacity for self-reflection: its power to mirror reality and reveal something new. The latter have placed weight on its ‘primal scene’ character and have underlined its failure to move Hamlet to act. Here I explore the paradox that results from putting philosophy and psychoanalysis together. To illustrate its functions, as well as the different readings of it, I delve into certain moments of the scene and Hamlet several times. Expanding on some remarks made by Lacan about the Mousetrap, I contend that it is a ‘rigging system’, a highly complex mise-en-abyme structure and intersubjective complex unfolded over successive layers. This explains the self-reflectivity discerned by philosophers. Following Benjamin and Lacan, and by means of a detour through Schmitt, I argue at the end that its failure needs to be situated in the historical moment when it was created – a world characterised by the lack of transcendent values – one in which art folds back upon itself infinitely.</description>
<date>2024-08-29</date>
<date>2024-08-29</date>
<date>2022</date>
<type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</type>
<identifier>Arribas S. 'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Textual Pract. 2022;36(9):1537-58. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</identifier>
<identifier>0950-236X</identifier>
<identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60947</identifier>
<identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</identifier>
<language>eng</language>
<relation>Textual Practice. 2022;36(9):1537-58.</relation>
<relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</relation>
<rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights>
<rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Textual Practice on 01 Sep 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</rights>
<publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher>
</thesis>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<record schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>00925njm 22002777a 4500</leader>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="042">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="720">
<subfield code="a">Arribas, Sonia</subfield>
<subfield code="e">author</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="260">
<subfield code="c">2022</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="520">
<subfield code="a">A great part of Hamlet’s mystery resides in the Mousetrap. Its role is fundamental for the tension of the play, yet its importance extends beyond that. Philosophers and psychoanalysts alike have been fascinated by it. The former have underlined its epistemological aspects and capacity for self-reflection: its power to mirror reality and reveal something new. The latter have placed weight on its ‘primal scene’ character and have underlined its failure to move Hamlet to act. Here I explore the paradox that results from putting philosophy and psychoanalysis together. To illustrate its functions, as well as the different readings of it, I delve into certain moments of the scene and Hamlet several times. Expanding on some remarks made by Lacan about the Mousetrap, I contend that it is a ‘rigging system’, a highly complex mise-en-abyme structure and intersubjective complex unfolded over successive layers. This explains the self-reflectivity discerned by philosophers. Following Benjamin and Lacan, and by means of a detour through Schmitt, I argue at the end that its failure needs to be situated in the historical moment when it was created – a world characterised by the lack of transcendent values – one in which art folds back upon itself infinitely.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">Arribas S. 'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Textual Pract. 2022;36(9):1537-58. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">0950-236X</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60947</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="0" ind2="0" tag="245">
<subfield code="a">'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<mets ID=" DSpace_ITEM_10230-60947" OBJID=" hdl:10230/60947" PROFILE="DSpace METS SIP Profile 1.0" TYPE="DSpace ITEM" schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd">
<metsHdr CREATEDATE="2024-09-26T10:59:09Z">
<agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION">
<name>Repositori digital de la UPF</name>
</agent>
</metsHdr>
<dmdSec ID="DMD_10230_60947">
<mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS">
<xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:mods schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Arribas, Sonia</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
</mods:extension>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</mods:dateAvailable>
</mods:extension>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2022</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:identifier type="citation">Arribas S. 'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Textual Pract. 2022;36(9):1537-58. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="issn">0950-236X</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60947</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="doi">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>A great part of Hamlet’s mystery resides in the Mousetrap. Its role is fundamental for the tension of the play, yet its importance extends beyond that. Philosophers and psychoanalysts alike have been fascinated by it. The former have underlined its epistemological aspects and capacity for self-reflection: its power to mirror reality and reveal something new. The latter have placed weight on its ‘primal scene’ character and have underlined its failure to move Hamlet to act. Here I explore the paradox that results from putting philosophy and psychoanalysis together. To illustrate its functions, as well as the different readings of it, I delve into certain moments of the scene and Hamlet several times. Expanding on some remarks made by Lacan about the Mousetrap, I contend that it is a ‘rigging system’, a highly complex mise-en-abyme structure and intersubjective complex unfolded over successive layers. This explains the self-reflectivity discerned by philosophers. Following Benjamin and Lacan, and by means of a detour through Schmitt, I argue at the end that its failure needs to be situated in the historical moment when it was created – a world characterised by the lack of transcendent values – one in which art folds back upon itself infinitely.</mods:abstract>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm authority="rfc3066">eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Textual Practice on 01 Sep 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>
</xmlData>
</mdWrap>
</dmdSec>
<amdSec ID="FO_10230_60947_1">
<techMD ID="TECH_O_10230_60947_1">
<mdWrap MDTYPE="PREMIS">
<xmlData schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/PREMIS-v1-0.xsd">
<premis:premis>
<premis:object>
<premis:objectIdentifier>
<premis:objectIdentifierType>URL</premis:objectIdentifierType>
<premis:objectIdentifierValue>http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/60947/1/Arribas_tex_good.pdf</premis:objectIdentifierValue>
</premis:objectIdentifier>
<premis:objectCategory>File</premis:objectCategory>
<premis:objectCharacteristics>
<premis:fixity>
<premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>MD5</premis:messageDigestAlgorithm>
<premis:messageDigest>bed9112ffc4b110fc1fd46ac589702b3</premis:messageDigest>
</premis:fixity>
<premis:size>259780</premis:size>
<premis:format>
<premis:formatDesignation>
<premis:formatName>application/pdf</premis:formatName>
</premis:formatDesignation>
</premis:format>
</premis:objectCharacteristics>
<premis:originalName>Arribas_tex_good.pdf</premis:originalName>
</premis:object>
</premis:premis>
</xmlData>
</mdWrap>
</techMD>
</amdSec>
<fileSec>
<fileGrp USE="ORIGINAL">
<file ADMID="FO_10230_60947_1" CHECKSUM="bed9112ffc4b110fc1fd46ac589702b3" CHECKSUMTYPE="MD5" GROUPID="GROUP_BITSTREAM_10230_60947_1" ID="BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_10230_60947_1" MIMETYPE="application/pdf" SEQ="1" SIZE="259780">
</file>
</fileGrp>
</fileSec>
<structMap LABEL="DSpace Object" TYPE="LOGICAL">
<div ADMID="DMD_10230_60947" TYPE="DSpace Object Contents">
<div TYPE="DSpace BITSTREAM">
</div>
</div>
</structMap>
</mets>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<mods:mods schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Arribas, Sonia</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAvailable encoding="iso8601">2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</mods:dateAvailable>
</mods:extension>
<mods:extension>
<mods:dateAccessioned encoding="iso8601">2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</mods:dateAccessioned>
</mods:extension>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2022</mods:dateIssued>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:identifier type="citation">Arribas S. 'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Textual Pract. 2022;36(9):1537-58. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="issn">0950-236X</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60947</mods:identifier>
<mods:identifier type="doi">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>A great part of Hamlet’s mystery resides in the Mousetrap. Its role is fundamental for the tension of the play, yet its importance extends beyond that. Philosophers and psychoanalysts alike have been fascinated by it. The former have underlined its epistemological aspects and capacity for self-reflection: its power to mirror reality and reveal something new. The latter have placed weight on its ‘primal scene’ character and have underlined its failure to move Hamlet to act. Here I explore the paradox that results from putting philosophy and psychoanalysis together. To illustrate its functions, as well as the different readings of it, I delve into certain moments of the scene and Hamlet several times. Expanding on some remarks made by Lacan about the Mousetrap, I contend that it is a ‘rigging system’, a highly complex mise-en-abyme structure and intersubjective complex unfolded over successive layers. This explains the self-reflectivity discerned by philosophers. Following Benjamin and Lacan, and by means of a detour through Schmitt, I argue at the end that its failure needs to be situated in the historical moment when it was created – a world characterised by the lack of transcendent values – one in which art folds back upon itself infinitely.</mods:abstract>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm>eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Textual Practice on 01 Sep 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:titleInfo>
<mods:title>'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</mods:title>
</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</mods:genre>
</mods:mods>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<atom:entry schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom http://www.kbcafe.com/rss/atom.xsd.xml">
<atom:id>http://oai-repositori.upf.edu/oai/metadata/handle/10230/60947/ore.xml</atom:id>
<atom:published>2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</atom:published>
<atom:updated>2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</atom:updated>
<atom:source>
<atom:generator>Repositori digital de la UPF</atom:generator>
</atom:source>
<atom:title>'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</atom:title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Arribas, Sonia</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<oreatom:triples>
<rdf:Description about="http://oai-repositori.upf.edu/oai/metadata/handle/10230/60947/ore.xml#atom">
<dcterms:modified>2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</dcterms:modified>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/60947/2/Arribas_tex_good.pdf.jpg">
<dcterms:description>THUMBNAIL</dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description about="http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/60947/1/Arribas_tex_good.pdf">
<dcterms:description>ORIGINAL</dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description>
</oreatom:triples>
</atom:entry>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<qdc:qualifieddc schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd">
<dc:title>'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Arribas, Sonia</dc:creator>
<dcterms:abstract>A great part of Hamlet’s mystery resides in the Mousetrap. Its role is fundamental for the tension of the play, yet its importance extends beyond that. Philosophers and psychoanalysts alike have been fascinated by it. The former have underlined its epistemological aspects and capacity for self-reflection: its power to mirror reality and reveal something new. The latter have placed weight on its ‘primal scene’ character and have underlined its failure to move Hamlet to act. Here I explore the paradox that results from putting philosophy and psychoanalysis together. To illustrate its functions, as well as the different readings of it, I delve into certain moments of the scene and Hamlet several times. Expanding on some remarks made by Lacan about the Mousetrap, I contend that it is a ‘rigging system’, a highly complex mise-en-abyme structure and intersubjective complex unfolded over successive layers. This explains the self-reflectivity discerned by philosophers. Following Benjamin and Lacan, and by means of a detour through Schmitt, I argue at the end that its failure needs to be situated in the historical moment when it was created – a world characterised by the lack of transcendent values – one in which art folds back upon itself infinitely.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:date>2022</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Arribas S. 'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Textual Pract. 2022;36(9):1537-58. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0950-236X</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60947</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Textual Practice. 2022;36(9):1537-58.</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Textual Practice on 01 Sep 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Taylor & Francis</dc:publisher>
</qdc:qualifieddc>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
<ow:Publication about="oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/60947">
<dc:title>'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Arribas, Sonia</dc:creator>
<dc:description>A great part of Hamlet’s mystery resides in the Mousetrap. Its role is fundamental for the tension of the play, yet its importance extends beyond that. Philosophers and psychoanalysts alike have been fascinated by it. The former have underlined its epistemological aspects and capacity for self-reflection: its power to mirror reality and reveal something new. The latter have placed weight on its ‘primal scene’ character and have underlined its failure to move Hamlet to act. Here I explore the paradox that results from putting philosophy and psychoanalysis together. To illustrate its functions, as well as the different readings of it, I delve into certain moments of the scene and Hamlet several times. Expanding on some remarks made by Lacan about the Mousetrap, I contend that it is a ‘rigging system’, a highly complex mise-en-abyme structure and intersubjective complex unfolded over successive layers. This explains the self-reflectivity discerned by philosophers. Following Benjamin and Lacan, and by means of a detour through Schmitt, I argue at the end that its failure needs to be situated in the historical moment when it was created – a world characterised by the lack of transcendent values – one in which art folds back upon itself infinitely.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2022</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>Arribas S. 'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Textual Pract. 2022;36(9):1537-58. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>0950-236X</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60947</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Textual Practice. 2022;36(9):1537-58.</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Textual Practice on 01 Sep 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>Taylor & Francis</dc:publisher>
</ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<metadata schemaLocation="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai http://www.lyncode.com/xsd/xoai.xsd">
<element name="dc">
<element name="contributor">
<element name="author">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Arribas, Sonia</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="date">
<element name="accessioned">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="available">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">2024-08-29T06:54:21Z</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="issued">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">2022</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="identifier">
<element name="citation">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Arribas S. 'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis. Textual Pract. 2022;36(9):1537-58. DOI: 10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="issn">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">0950-236X</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="uri">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60947</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="doi">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="description">
<element name="abstract">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">A great part of Hamlet’s mystery resides in the Mousetrap. Its role is fundamental for the tension of the play, yet its importance extends beyond that. Philosophers and psychoanalysts alike have been fascinated by it. The former have underlined its epistemological aspects and capacity for self-reflection: its power to mirror reality and reveal something new. The latter have placed weight on its ‘primal scene’ character and have underlined its failure to move Hamlet to act. Here I explore the paradox that results from putting philosophy and psychoanalysis together. To illustrate its functions, as well as the different readings of it, I delve into certain moments of the scene and Hamlet several times. Expanding on some remarks made by Lacan about the Mousetrap, I contend that it is a ‘rigging system’, a highly complex mise-en-abyme structure and intersubjective complex unfolded over successive layers. This explains the self-reflectivity discerned by philosophers. Following Benjamin and Lacan, and by means of a detour through Schmitt, I argue at the end that its failure needs to be situated in the historical moment when it was created – a world characterised by the lack of transcendent values – one in which art folds back upon itself infinitely.</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="provenance">
<element name="en">
<field name="value">Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-29T06:54:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Arribas_tex_good.pdf: 259780 bytes, checksum: bed9112ffc4b110fc1fd46ac589702b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="sponsorship">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">This work was supported by MINECO: [grant number FFI2015-70273-P].</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="format">
<element name="mimetype">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">application/pdf</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="language">
<element name="iso">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">eng</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="publisher">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Taylor & Francis</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="relation">
<element name="ispartof">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Textual Practice. 2022;36(9):1537-58.</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="projectID">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/1PE/FFI2015-70273-P</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="rights">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">© This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Textual Practice on 01 Sep 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0950236X.2021.1972444</field>
</element>
<element name="accessRights">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="title">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">'As good as a chorus': Hamlet’s Mousetrap in philosophy and psychoanalysis</field>
</element>
</element>
<element name="type">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</field>
</element>
<element name="version">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="subject">
<element name="keyword">
<element name="none">
<field name="value">Hamlet</field>
<field name="value">Freud</field>
<field name="value">Benjamin</field>
<field name="value">Lacan</field>
<field name="value">Schmitt</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="bundles">
<element name="bundle">
<field name="name">THUMBNAIL</field>
<element name="bitstreams">
<element name="bitstream">
<field name="name">Arribas_tex_good.pdf.jpg</field>
<field name="originalName">Arribas_tex_good.pdf.jpg</field>
<field name="description">IM Thumbnail</field>
<field name="format">image/jpeg</field>
<field name="size">17901</field>
<field name="url">http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/60947/2/Arribas_tex_good.pdf.jpg</field>
<field name="checksum">d99ae0e68a1eec48caa4be2a4468cdec</field>
<field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
<field name="sid">2</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="bundle">
<field name="name">ORIGINAL</field>
<element name="bitstreams">
<element name="bitstream">
<field name="name">Arribas_tex_good.pdf</field>
<field name="format">application/pdf</field>
<field name="size">259780</field>
<field name="url">http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/60947/1/Arribas_tex_good.pdf</field>
<field name="checksum">bed9112ffc4b110fc1fd46ac589702b3</field>
<field name="checksumAlgorithm">MD5</field>
<field name="sid">1</field>
</element>
</element>
</element>
</element>
<element name="others">
<field name="handle">10230/60947</field>
<field name="identifier">oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/60947</field>
<field name="lastModifyDate">2024-08-30 03:31:10.463</field>
</element>
<element name="repository">
<field name="name">Repositori digital de la UPF</field>
<field name="mail">repositori@upf.edu</field>
</element>
</metadata>