'Mandate' is Not a Four-letter Word: Taking Open Access Scholarly Communication Forward
De Beer, Jennifer A.
J. Technical services in libraries, archives and museums::JH. Digital preservation
H. Information sources, supports, channels::HL. Databases and DataBase Networking
H. Information sources, supports, channels::HN. e-journals
H. Information sources, supports, channels::HP. e-resources
B. Information use and sociology of information
H. Information sources, supports, channels::HS. Repositories (OAI-compliant and not)
With increased awareness of, and in many cases, investment in, forms of Open Access scholarly communication, those within the scholarly arena cast about for the best way forward. Of the routes currently suggested, an Open Access mandate is mentioned as one way forward. Yet scholars frequently seem to bristle at the term 'mandate', seemingly opposed to such institutional or governmental intervention in their scholarly affairs. This paper argues, however, that mandating Open Access should not be the bugbear it is perceived to be, and that it is in fact a viable way forward in fomenting greater access to research output.
2005
Presentation
http://hdl.handle.net/10760/7694
en
Strategies for Permanent Access to Scientific Information in Southern Africa
application/pdf
http://eprints.rclis.org/copyright/