Hispana. Acceso en línea al Patrimonio Cultural Digital Español

Está en:  › Datos de registro

Hume e as teorias morais vulgares

Identificadores del recurso

http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3852325

(Revista) ISSN 0104-8694

Procedencia

(DIALNET - Artículos)

Ficha

Título:: Hume e as teorias morais vulgares
Tema:: filosofia moral escocesa; Hume; Hutcheson; ser e dever; teorias vulgares da moralidade; Is-ought; vulgar systems of morality; Scottish Modern Moral Philosophy
Descripción:: Which are the vulgar moral systems criticized by Hume in the famous Treatise�s is-ought passage? Which are their representatives? Is this essay, I will deal with some differences between Hume and Hutcheson that can illuminate an answer. Hume, contrary to Hutcheson, fought all kinds of divisions of human nature in natural and divine components. The concept of sympathy has an essential function in his approach. There are good evidences that the young Hume adopted in Treatise an open strategic criticism to all influential moral theories of his time: the contractual voluntarism, the rationalistic ethicists, and the religious conceptions under the influence of the dogmatic Scottish evangelism. In this way, Hume has got some distance from Hutcheson, yet his criticism included the approaches influenced by the natural law theories with reference in the divine providence. The is-ought passage signalizes this strategy. Nevertheless, his juvenile impetuosity resulted in a lot of personal misfortunes. It will make Hume to mitigate his philosophical aggressiveness in his maturity, adopting in his posterior writings a more balanced stance.; Quais são as teorias vulgares da moralidade criticadas por Hume na famosa passagem is-ought? Quais eram seus defensores? Neste ensaio, trato de algumas diferenças entre Hume e Hutcheson que podem iluminar algumas respostas. Hume, ao contrário de Hutcheson, combateu toda forma de separação da natureza humana em componentes naturais e divinos. O conceito de simpatia cumpre uma função essencial nesse aspecto. Há bons indícios de que o jovem Hume adotou no Tratado uma estratégia abertamente crítica a todas as teorias morais defendidas pelos pensadores, religiosos e moralistas de sua época. Isso inclui o voluntarismo contratualista, as éticas racionalistas, bem como as concepções religiosas influenciadas pelo dogmatismo evangélico escocês. Nisso Hume distanciou-se de Hutcheson, pois sua crítica também incluía as visões influenciadas pelas teorias do direito natural com referência na providência divina. A passagem is-ought sinaliza essa intenção. Todavia, todo esse ímpeto juvenil resultou numa série de maus resultados pessoais, o que o levou, na maturidade a mitigar sua agressividade filosófica e a adotar, em seus escritos, uma atitude mais equilibrada.
Fuente:: Princípios: Revista de Filosofia, ISSN 0104-8694, Vol. 18, Nº. 29, 2011
Idioma:: Portuguese
Autor/Productor:: Azevedo, Marco Antônio Oliveira de
Editor:: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Derechos:: LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
Fecha:: 2011
Tipo de recurso:: text (article)
Formato:: application/pdf

oai_dc

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
1. <dc:title>Hume e as teorias morais vulgares</dc:title>
2. <dc:creator>Azevedo, Marco Antônio Oliveira de</dc:creator>
3. <dc:subject>filosofia moral escocesa</dc:subject>
4. <dc:subject>Hume</dc:subject>
5. <dc:subject>Hutcheson</dc:subject>
6. <dc:subject>ser e dever</dc:subject>
7. <dc:subject>teorias vulgares da moralidade</dc:subject>
8. <dc:subject>Hume</dc:subject>
9. <dc:subject>Hutcheson</dc:subject>
10. <dc:subject>Is-ought</dc:subject>
11. <dc:subject>vulgar systems of morality</dc:subject>
12. <dc:subject>Scottish Modern Moral Philosophy</dc:subject>
13. <dc:description>Which are the vulgar moral systems criticized by Hume in the famous Treatise�s is-ought passage? Which are their representatives? Is this essay, I will deal with some differences between Hume and Hutcheson that can illuminate an answer. Hume, contrary to Hutcheson, fought all kinds of divisions of human nature in natural and divine components. The concept of sympathy has an essential function in his approach. There are good evidences that the young Hume adopted in Treatise an open strategic criticism to all influential moral theories of his time: the contractual voluntarism, the rationalistic ethicists, and the religious conceptions under the influence of the dogmatic Scottish evangelism. In this way, Hume has got some distance from Hutcheson, yet his criticism included the approaches influenced by the natural law theories with reference in the divine providence. The is-ought passage signalizes this strategy. Nevertheless, his juvenile impetuosity resulted in a lot of personal misfortunes. It will make Hume to mitigate his philosophical aggressiveness in his maturity, adopting in his posterior writings a more balanced stance.</dc:description>
14. <dc:description>Quais são as teorias vulgares da moralidade criticadas por Hume na famosa passagem is-ought? Quais eram seus defensores? Neste ensaio, trato de algumas diferenças entre Hume e Hutcheson que podem iluminar algumas respostas. Hume, ao contrário de Hutcheson, combateu toda forma de separação da natureza humana em componentes naturais e divinos. O conceito de simpatia cumpre uma função essencial nesse aspecto. Há bons indícios de que o jovem Hume adotou no Tratado uma estratégia abertamente crítica a todas as teorias morais defendidas pelos pensadores, religiosos e moralistas de sua época. Isso inclui o voluntarismo contratualista, as éticas racionalistas, bem como as concepções religiosas influenciadas pelo dogmatismo evangélico escocês. Nisso Hume distanciou-se de Hutcheson, pois sua crítica também incluía as visões influenciadas pelas teorias do direito natural com referência na providência divina. A passagem is-ought sinaliza essa intenção. Todavia, todo esse ímpeto juvenil resultou numa série de maus resultados pessoais, o que o levou, na maturidade a mitigar sua agressividade filosófica e a adotar, em seus escritos, uma atitude mais equilibrada.</dc:description>
15. <dc:publisher>Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte</dc:publisher>
16. <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
17. <dc:type>text (article)</dc:type>
18. <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
19. <dc:identifier>http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3852325</dc:identifier>
20. <dc:identifier>(Revista) ISSN 0104-8694</dc:identifier>
21. <dc:source>Princípios: Revista de Filosofia, ISSN 0104-8694, Vol. 18, Nº. 29, 2011</dc:source>
22. <dc:language>por</dc:language>
23. <dc:rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>