<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Efficient multilateralism or bilateralism? The TTIP from an EU Trade Policy perspective</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Garcia-Duran Huet, Patricia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Millet, Montserrat</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Política comercial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economia internacional</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economia regional</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integració econòmica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Unió Europea</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Commercial policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International economic relations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regional econòmics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>European Union</dc:subject>
<dc:description>The EU bilateral trade strategy since 2006, including the TTIP, has been justified by the European Commission on the bases that deep and comprehensive trade agreements are compatible with efficient multilateralism. The Commission argument is the following: in a context marked by International supply-chains, preferential agreements that allow for progress on what has been achieved at the multilateral level (topics WTO +) and in areas not already covered by the WTO (items WTO- X) may be considered as a stepping stone, not a stumbling block for multilateral liberalization. In other words, EU recent bilateral negotiations and agreements should be seen at worst as complementary to multilateral negotiations and at best as promoters.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Universitat de Barcelona. Facultat d'Economia i Empresa</dc:publisher>
<dc:contributor>Universitat de Barcelona</dc:contributor>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2445/66896</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights>cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Garcia-Duran Huet et al., 2015</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</a></dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<didl:DIDL schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd ">
<didl:DIDLInfo>
<dcterms:created schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ ">2016-02-21T23:27:59Z</dcterms:created>
</didl:DIDLInfo>
<didl:Item id="uuid-22d6d2a1-31a8-4b27-bb5b-b0e57d8617d2">
<didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<dii:Identifier schemaLocation="urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd">urn:hdl:2072/254281</dii:Identifier>
</didl:Statement>
</didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Descriptor>
<didl:Statement mimeType="application/xml; charset=utf-8">
<oai_dc:dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Efficient multilateralism or bilateralism? The TTIP from an EU Trade Policy perspective</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Garcia-Duran Huet, Patricia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Millet, Montserrat</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Política comercial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economia internacional</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economia regional</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integració econòmica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Unió Europea</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Commercial policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International economic relations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regional econòmics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>European Union</dc:subject>
<dc:description>The EU bilateral trade strategy since 2006, including the TTIP, has been justified by the European Commission on the bases that deep and comprehensive trade agreements are compatible with efficient multilateralism. The Commission argument is the following: in a context marked by International supply-chains, preferential agreements that allow for progress on what has been achieved at the multilateral level (topics WTO +) and in areas not already covered by the WTO (items WTO- X) may be considered as a stepping stone, not a stumbling block for multilateral liberalization. In other words, EU recent bilateral negotiations and agreements should be seen at worst as complementary to multilateral negotiations and at best as promoters.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Universitat de Barcelona. Facultat d'Economia i Empresa</dc:publisher>
<dc:contributor>Universitat de Barcelona</dc:contributor>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2445/66896</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights>cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Garcia-Duran Huet et al., 2015</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</a></dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</didl:Statement>
</didl:Descriptor>
</didl:Item>
</didl:DIDL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<record schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<leader>am 3u</leader>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="042">
<subfield code="a">dc</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="520">
<subfield code="a">The EU bilateral trade strategy since 2006, including the TTIP, has been justified by the European Commission on the bases that deep and comprehensive trade agreements are compatible with efficient multilateralism. The Commission argument is the following: in a context marked by International supply-chains, preferential agreements that allow for progress on what has been achieved at the multilateral level (topics WTO +) and in areas not already covered by the WTO (items WTO- X) may be considered as a stepping stone, not a stumbling block for multilateral liberalization. In other words, EU recent bilateral negotiations and agreements should be seen at worst as complementary to multilateral negotiations and at best as promoters.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="8" ind2=" " tag="024">
<subfield code="a">http://hdl.handle.net/2445/66896</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="546">
<subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Política comercial</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Economia internacional</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Economia regional</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Integració econòmica</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Unió Europea</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Commercial policy</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">International economic relations</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Regional econòmics</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">Economic Integration</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1=" " ind2=" " tag="653">
<subfield code="a">European Union</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield ind1="0" ind2="0" tag="245">
<subfield code="a">Efficient multilateralism or bilateralism? The TTIP from an EU Trade Policy perspective</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<mets LABEL="DSpace Item" OBJID="hdl:2072/254281" schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd">
<metsHdr CREATEDATE="2016-02-22T00:27:59">
<agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION">
<name>RECERCAT (Diposit de la Recerca de Catalunya)</name>
</agent>
</metsHdr>
<dmdSec ID="DMD_hdl_2072/254281">
<mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS">
<xmlData>
<mods:name>
<mods:namePart>Universitat de Barcelona</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Garcia-Duran Huet, Patricia</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:name>
<mods:role>
<mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm>
</mods:role>
<mods:namePart>Millet, Montserrat</mods:namePart>
</mods:name>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:dateOther encoding="iso8601">2015</mods:dateOther>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:relatedItem type="host">
<mods:part>
<mods:text>1136-8365</mods:text>
</mods:part>
</mods:relatedItem>
<mods:identifier type="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/2445/66896</mods:identifier>
<mods:abstract>The EU bilateral trade strategy since 2006, including the TTIP, has been justified by the European Commission on the bases that deep and comprehensive trade agreements are compatible with efficient multilateralism. The Commission argument is the following: in a context marked by International supply-chains, preferential agreements that allow for progress on what has been achieved at the multilateral level (topics WTO +) and in areas not already covered by the WTO (items WTO- X) may be considered as a stepping stone, not a stumbling block for multilateral liberalization. In other words, EU recent bilateral negotiations and agreements should be seen at worst as complementary to multilateral negotiations and at best as promoters.</mods:abstract>
<mods:physicalDescription>
<mods:form>26 p.</mods:form>
</mods:physicalDescription>
<mods:physicalDescription>
<mods:form>application/pdf</mods:form>
</mods:physicalDescription>
<mods:language>
<mods:languageTerm authority="rfc3066">eng</mods:languageTerm>
</mods:language>
<mods:originInfo>
<mods:publisher>Universitat de Barcelona. Facultat d'Economia i Empresa</mods:publisher>
</mods:originInfo>
<mods:relatedItem>
<mods:title>Reproducció del document publicat a: http://www.ub.edu/ubeconomics/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/321WEB1.pdf</mods:title>
</mods:relatedItem>
<mods:relatedItem>
<mods:title>UB Economics – Working Papers, 2015, E15/321</mods:title>
</mods:relatedItem>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Garcia-Duran Huet et al., 2015</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</mods:accessCondition>
<mods:accessCondition type="useAndReproduction"><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</a></mods:accessCondition>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Política comercial</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Economia internacional</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Economia regional</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Integració econòmica</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Unió Europea</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Commercial policy</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>International economic relations</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Regional econòmics</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>Economic Integration</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:subject>
<mods:topic>European Union</mods:topic>
</mods:subject>
<mods:titleInfo>Efficient multilateralism or bilateralism? The TTIP from an EU Trade Policy perspective</mods:titleInfo>
<mods:genre>info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper</mods:genre>
</xmlData>
</mdWrap>
</dmdSec>
<structMap>
</structMap>
</mets>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<atom:entry>
<atom:id>http://www.recercat.cat//oai/metadata/handle/2072/254281/ore.xml</atom:id>
<atom:published>2016-02-22T00:27:59.059+01:00</atom:published>
<atom:updated>2016-02-22T00:27:59.059+01:00</atom:updated>
<atom:source>
<atom:generator uri="http://www.recercat.cat//oai">RECERCAT (Diposit de la Recerca de Catalunya)</atom:generator>
</atom:source>
<atom:title>Efficient multilateralism or bilateralism? The TTIP from an EU Trade Policy perspective</atom:title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Garcia-Duran Huet, Patricia</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Millet, Montserrat</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<oreatom:triples>
<rdf:Description about="http://www.recercat.cat//oai/metadata/handle/2072/254281/ore.xml">
<dcterms:modified>2015-09-16T00:22:08.587+02:00</dcterms:modified>
</rdf:Description>
</oreatom:triples>
</atom:entry>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<dc:contributor lang="" schemaLocation="http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd">Universitat de Barcelona</dc:contributor>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
<ow:Publication about="oai:www.recercat.cat:2072/254281">
<dc:contributor>Universitat de Barcelona</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Garcia-Duran Huet, Patricia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Millet, Montserrat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2015</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>1136-8365</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2445/66896</dc:identifier>
<dc:description>The EU bilateral trade strategy since 2006, including the TTIP, has been justified by the European Commission on the bases that deep and comprehensive trade agreements are compatible with efficient multilateralism. The Commission argument is the following: in a context marked by International supply-chains, preferential agreements that allow for progress on what has been achieved at the multilateral level (topics WTO +) and in areas not already covered by the WTO (items WTO- X) may be considered as a stepping stone, not a stumbling block for multilateral liberalization. In other words, EU recent bilateral negotiations and agreements should be seen at worst as complementary to multilateral negotiations and at best as promoters.</dc:description>
<dc:format>26 p.</dc:format>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>Universitat de Barcelona. Facultat d'Economia i Empresa</dc:publisher>
<dc:relation>Reproducció del document publicat a: http://www.ub.edu/ubeconomics/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/321WEB1.pdf</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>UB Economics – Working Papers, 2015, E15/321</dc:relation>
<dc:rights>cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Garcia-Duran Huet et al., 2015</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</a></dc:rights>
<dc:subject>Política comercial</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economia internacional</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economia regional</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integració econòmica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Unió Europea</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Commercial policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International economic relations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regional econòmics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>European Union</dc:subject>
<dc:title>Efficient multilateralism or bilateralism? The TTIP from an EU Trade Policy perspective</dc:title>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper</dc:type>
<dc:source>ERE - Espai de Recerca en Economia</dc:source>
<dc:source>Universitat de Barcelona</dc:source>
<dc:source>Documents de treball (ERE - Espai de Recerca en Economia)</dc:source>
</ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>